IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Reducing Vertical Fiscal Imbalance in Australia: Is There a Need for State Personal Income Taxation?

Listed author(s):
  • Row, Richard

    (Australian Housing & Urban Research Institute)

  • Duhs, Al

    (University of Queensland)

Tax reform is back on the economic and political agendas. Two significant reports to governments in 1996 have highlighted deficiencies in the current arrangements. First, the Australian Productivity Commission (1996) has submitted to the Howard Government that there is a need for fundamental tax reform, given the inappropriate incentive and efficiency effects of the existing tax system. Secondly, the Queensland Commission of Audit has argued more specifically that “the degree of vertical fiscal imbalance (VFI) in the Australian Federation is extreme and dysfunctional”. The Commission adds that accountability of both State and Federal Governments is blurred in consequence, thereby reducing fiscal responsibility. Recent High Court decisions on the definition of excise taxes add further significance to the need for economic analysis of, and political debate of, plausible changes to Commonwealth-State financial relations. While the overall tax reform debate focuses on the issue of broadening the tax base, one specific issue important to the debate is VFI and the possible reassignment of Commonwealth and State taxes. In this context we argue that a State personal income tax surcharge would facilitate a reduction in the extent of VFI, and thus promote a more efficient economy and effective federation. Various tax options for reducing VFI are considered, along with implications for public sector accountability and efficiency.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Economic Analysis and Policy (EAP).

Volume (Year): 28 (1998)
Issue (Month): 1 (March)
Pages: 69-83

in new window

Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:28:y:1998:i:1:p:69-83
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:28:y:1998:i:1:p:69-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.