IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v24y1994i1p1-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medicare and Private and Public Medical Practice: Utilisation and Substitution

Author

Listed:
  • Doessel, D.P.

    (University of Queensland)

Abstract

The Commonwealth Government is currently undertaking a review of various issues in the health sector. A recently published study by John Deeble has analysed expenditures, utilisation, workforce issues etc. under Australia’s current health insurance arrangements (Medicare) for the provision of medical services remunerated on a fee-for-service basis. This study has highlighted increased utilisation of services as a major “management issue”. It is demonstrated here that the data on which these conclusions are based are deficient in several respects. By analysis of other data it is indicated that the picture of fee-for-service medical practice under Medicare presented by Deeble is out of focus in several important dimensions. More specifically, the high utilisation rates have been obtained by “adjusting” data and ignoring substitution behaviour between services provided by outpatient departments at public hospitals and services provided on a fee-for-service basis. Also the Deeble analysis has ignored institutional changes that involve “transfers” of health expenditures from one government entity to another. This study shows that on the basis of empirical data, Deeble has considerably overestimated the growth of per capita utilisation of medical services in Australia since the introduction of Medicare. It also casts doubt on the need for “reform”.

Suggested Citation

  • Doessel, D.P., 1994. "Medicare and Private and Public Medical Practice: Utilisation and Substitution," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 1-21.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:24:y:1994:i:1:p:1-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592694500018
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H51 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Health
    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:24:y:1994:i:1:p:1-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.