IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v88y2018icp486-489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parents' perceptions of the value of sexual abuse medical evaluations of their children

Author

Listed:
  • Worley, Karen B.
  • Church, Janice K.
  • Worthington, Toss
  • Swearingen, Christopher J.
  • Jones, Jerry G.

Abstract

Most sexual abuse medical examinations reveal no abnormalities. This study's objective was to assess the value of a “certification of normalcy” for parents whose children had/didn't have abuse evaluations. Two questionnaires were developed for administration to guardians of sexually abused children enrolling in a specialized outpatient mental health program. On the questionnaire given to 42 parents whose children had received medical evaluations, caregivers commonly endorsed prior concerns about injuries, infections, genital penetration, and proof of sexual assault. 74% rated the examinations as helpful to them and 41% of caregivers believed knowledge of the results was helpful for their children age seven or older. 76% of guardians indicated they would obtain examinations if events were recreated. The questionnaire given to 47 parents of non-examined children revealed less concern about injury, infection and signs of penetration. However, 28% of these caregivers indicated they would obtain examinations if events were recreated. Study results support a belief that sexual abuse medical evaluations have value to many parents.

Suggested Citation

  • Worley, Karen B. & Church, Janice K. & Worthington, Toss & Swearingen, Christopher J. & Jones, Jerry G., 2018. "Parents' perceptions of the value of sexual abuse medical evaluations of their children," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 486-489.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:88:y:2018:i:c:p:486-489
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.04.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740917310009
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.04.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:88:y:2018:i:c:p:486-489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.