IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v31y2009i1p89-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing candidates for adoptive parenthood. Institutional re-formulations of biographical notes

Author

Listed:
  • Noordegraaf, Martine
  • van Nijnatten, Carolus
  • Elbers, Ed

Abstract

Prospective adoptive parents who take part in a Dutch adoption assessment procedure are asked to write down their life stories. In this article we examine how information from the life stories is deleted, selected and transformed into a topic to talk about in an assessment interview and/or to write about in a recommendation record. We have shown in a detailed analysis how prospective adoptive parents demonstrate themselves to be "normal people" with "normal childhoods" and how life events are selected from the life stories as a means to assess the coping qualities of the prospective adoptive parents. We could conclude that social workers in the recommendation record: 1) turn statements made by the parents into facts; 2) leave statements in the parents' own words, and that they 3) assess suspicions of possible risk factors in the interview but omit them from the record. By using conversation analysis as a method we could gain an insight into the dynamics of assessment, making visible exactly how social workers collect information about people's background to arrive at a decision about whether the candidates are suitable adoptive parents.

Suggested Citation

  • Noordegraaf, Martine & van Nijnatten, Carolus & Elbers, Ed, 2009. "Assessing candidates for adoptive parenthood. Institutional re-formulations of biographical notes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 89-96, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:31:y:2009:i:1:p:89-96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190-7409(08)00157-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:31:y:2009:i:1:p:89-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.