Author
Listed:
- Lin, Xiaofeng
- Teixeira, Vitor Santos
Abstract
Adolescent emotional disorders − particularly anxiety and depression − are highly prevalent worldwide and increasingly recognized as major public health concerns. Mental health practitioners are therefore seeking intervention models that address both individual symptoms and the relational contexts in which adolescents develop. Family‑based interventions (FBIs) offer a promising approach by engaging caregivers as active partners in treatment. This systematic review examines the effectiveness of FBIs for adolescents aged 10–19 with emotional disorders, the mechanisms through which these interventions exert change, and the ways they are currently implemented and studied. Following PRISMA guidelines, 18 studies published since 2014 were identified across major mental health databases. Findings show substantial variation in FBIs design, delivery format, theoretical orientation, and intensity. Evidence for effectiveness is mixed: several interventions demonstrated significant reductions in anxiety and depressive symptoms, while others showed limited or short‑term effects compared to treatment as usual. Across studies, three mechanisms of change emerged consistently: (1) improved family relational dynamics, particularly parent–adolescent communication and attachment; (2) enhanced parental competencies, including emotion regulation and supportive parenting practices; and (3) direct cognitive‑behavioral skill development for adolescents. Methodological diversity and inconsistent outcome measures limit comparability across studies. Overall, FBIs represent a flexible and context‑sensitive approach to adolescent mental health, but further research is needed to clarify which components are most effective for which populations and under what conditions.
Suggested Citation
Lin, Xiaofeng & Teixeira, Vitor Santos, 2026.
"Family-based interventions for adolescent emotional disorders: a systematic review of effectiveness and mechanisms of change,"
Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:188:y:2026:i:c:s0190740926003920
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.109139
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:188:y:2026:i:c:s0190740926003920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.