Author
Abstract
The pervasive issue of parental intimate partner violence (IPV) during childhood is known to exert long-term influences on children’s development. However, the specific ways in which IPV shapes the diversity of adult family trajectories remain insufficiently explored. This study aims to identify distinct family trajectory types in young adulthood in China, examine the effects of childhood exposure to interparental physical violence on the propensity to follow normative versus atypical family trajectory types, differentiate the effects of mother- versus father-initiated IPV, and consider the potential moderating effects of individual characteristics. Data were drawn from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, a nationally representative dataset in China (N = 16,627). Sequence and cluster analysis, as well as multinomial logistic regression analyses, were conducted. This study identified 10 distinct trajectory types based on patterns of partnership formation, fertility behavior, and relationship stability. Children who were exposed to interparental physical violence exhibited consistently lower odds (ranging from 42% to 62%) of following stable family trajectories in early adulthood compared to those not exposed to parental IPV; instead, they were more likely to follow atypical family trajectories. These associations were consistent across various genders, ethnicities, hukou statuses, and birth cohorts. Gender-sensitive analyses indicated that IPV perpetrated by fathers, but not mothers, had detrimental effects on offspring’s family trajectories. In short, childhood exposure to paternal IPV has long-lasting impacts on children’s future family life trajectories. The uniform detrimental effects of IPV across sociodemographic groups underscore the need for inclusive support systems for those affected by parental IPV.
Suggested Citation
Luo, Mengsha, 2026.
"Beyond the moment: How children’s exposure to parental intimate partner violence shapes family life,"
Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:188:y:2026:i:c:s0190740926003877
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.109134
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:188:y:2026:i:c:s0190740926003877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.