IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v188y2026ics0190740926003609.html

Getting to guardianship: Impacts of kinship guardianship subsidies on guardianship permanency for foster care-involved youth

Author

Listed:
  • Shelton, Jenna L.

Abstract

Federal child welfare policies increasingly aim to support kinship guardianship, reflecting evidence that children placed with relatives experience better outcomes. However, estimates on the effects of kinship placement vary considerably by data quality, measurement choices, and approaches to selection bias. This study examines the impact of Title IV-E KinGAP, which offers federal financial assistance to relatives who assume legal guardianship of foster children in their care. Using linked administrative data and exploiting variation in the timing of state KinGAP enactments across the United States from 2009 to 2018, I employ event study methods to examine impacts on exit to guardianship. Results indicate that Title IV-E KinGAP did not significantly influence the likelihood of exiting foster care or exiting to a guardianship placement. These findings suggest that financial support alone may be insufficient to encourage kinship permanency and identify complementary policy opportunities to more effectively promote kinship placement and permanency for children in foster care.

Suggested Citation

  • Shelton, Jenna L., 2026. "Getting to guardianship: Impacts of kinship guardianship subsidies on guardianship permanency for foster care-involved youth," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:188:y:2026:i:c:s0190740926003609
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.109107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740926003609
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.109107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:188:y:2026:i:c:s0190740926003609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.