Author
Listed:
- Herbert, James L.
- Tindal, Rachael
- Mitchell, Mary
- Warrington, Camille
- Bovarnick, Silvie
- Parker, Naomi
Abstract
Multi-agency collaboration is central to integrated response models like the Barnahus and Children’s Advocacy Centers in operationalizing children’s rights; yet defining and measuring the quality of this collaboration remains a significant challenge for researchers and policymakers. This review aims to identify the underlying dimensions of collaboration quality in responses to child abuse and examine the degree to which existing instruments address these dimensions. A rapid review of 38 international studies published between 2000 and 2025 was conducted, synthesizing evidence from qualitative studies and instrument validation studies. The thematic analysis identified six primary domains associated with collaboration quality: Relational Foundations (e.g., trust and safety), Cognitive Foundations (e.g., shared mission), Communication, Active Processes (e.g., joint planning), and Systemic Enablers (e.g., resources) and Structural Frameworks (e.g., protocols). The review also identified and appraised 13 existing instruments used to assess these domains. Analysis revealed that while some standardized measures provided deep assessments of internal team dynamics, others functioned primarily as structural inventories, with few tools covering the full spectrum of the identified domains in a single instrument. The review outlines a framework of collaboration quality to inform future measure development efforts.
Suggested Citation
Herbert, James L. & Tindal, Rachael & Mitchell, Mary & Warrington, Camille & Bovarnick, Silvie & Parker, Naomi, 2026.
"Measuring collaboration quality in the context of Barnahus and Children’s Advocacy Centers: a thematic and measure review,"
Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:187:y:2026:i:c:s0190740926003300
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.109077
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:187:y:2026:i:c:s0190740926003300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.