IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v186y2026ics019074092600246x.html

An ecological perspective on what helps and hinders the well-being and role satisfaction of foster carers: A systematic scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Miko, Amy
  • McPherson, Lynne
  • Hindman, Emily

Abstract

Foster carers play a pivotal role in caring for children who cannot reside with their biological parents. However, they also face unique challenges that shape their caring experience and overall well-being. In light of recruitment and retention issues, a systematic scoping review was conducted to explore factors that influence well-being outcomes and role satisfaction in foster carers. Peer-reviewed research articles were screened using PRISMA. Ultimately, sixty scholarly, peer-reviewed articles were included and examined using reflexive thematic analysis. Analysis was driven by social-ecological theory in acknowledgment of the significant relational and systemic influences on the fostering experience. Foster carer well-being and role satisfaction appear to be influenced by 1) individual traits, skills and experiences, 2) formal and informal relationships, 3) case management and agency processes and 4) systemic, legal and socio-cultural factors. The review highlights the complex interrelationship between foster carers, their community and the broader child welfare system. It emphasises the need for collaborative and trauma-informed approaches to supporting foster carers. These findings have implications for research as well as practice and policy development, given that, ultimately, positive outcomes for foster carers can have positive impacts on the children in their care.

Suggested Citation

  • Miko, Amy & McPherson, Lynne & Hindman, Emily, 2026. "An ecological perspective on what helps and hinders the well-being and role satisfaction of foster carers: A systematic scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:186:y:2026:i:c:s019074092600246x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019074092600246X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108993?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:186:y:2026:i:c:s019074092600246x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.