IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v186y2026ics0190740926002434.html

Caregiver experiences with the Problem Resolution System (PRS) in Massachusetts

Author

Listed:
  • McKenna, John William
  • Unal, Neslihan Unluol
  • Klayman, Micah
  • Bifuh, Elizabeth
  • Hillier, Ashleigh

Abstract

Massachusetts received the highest federal rating for special education compliance despite a federal investigation and state audit being performed concurrently. This study reports the experiences of 19 caregivers with the Problem Resolution System (PRS), the agency responsible for handling special education related complaints for the state. Interviews were performed during the federal investigation and state audit, both of which were completed in January and August of 2025, respectively. Despite their relative privilege (e.g., being white, English speaking, having higher socioeconomic status), almost all caregivers described situations in which power imbalances impacted PRS access, procedures, and outcomes. Specifically, caregivers tended to describe investigations that lacked transparency, failed to address all aspects of their complaint, did not include findings of fact, exceeded mandated timelines, and included remedies that they believed did not fully account for lost opportunities or the harm done to their child. Some caregivers also described situations in which local education agencies repeatedly made the same violations and failed to provide mandated remedies. Implications for practice and oversight are discussed, as well as study limitations and areas for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • McKenna, John William & Unal, Neslihan Unluol & Klayman, Micah & Bifuh, Elizabeth & Hillier, Ashleigh, 2026. "Caregiver experiences with the Problem Resolution System (PRS) in Massachusetts," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:186:y:2026:i:c:s0190740926002434
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740926002434
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108990?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:186:y:2026:i:c:s0190740926002434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.