Author
Listed:
- McCauley, Erin J.
- Gibbons, Alexandra
- Wildeman, Christopher
- McKay, Tasseli
Abstract
Attrition is a persistent issue in the study of the transition to adulthood for youth who have aged out of foster care. One solution to ameliorate selection problems resulting from attrition is employing what we refer to as rapid data collection, a panel research approach aimed at reducing barriers to participation and keeping youth engaged in the project through frequent, brief survey modules. Drawing from our experience employing rapid data collection with youth transitioning out of foster care in New York City, where participants complete brief surveys including rotating modules on a bi-weekly basis (n = 290), we investigate attrition and provide recommendations for employing this approach. We found that nearly a third of youth enrolled in the study completed the baseline survey and no follow up surveys (n = 94). However, among those who completed at least one follow up survey (n = 196), almost half completed every survey. Youth who were not enrolled in school, not working and not looking for work, used the internet less than several times a day, and male or gender minority youth (relative to female youth) completed fewer follow-ups. Rapid data collection holds promise for keeping youth at high risk of attrition involved in longitudinal research, at least for youth who can make the transition to the brief repeated surveys. Future research using rapid data collection should prioritize using a brief baseline survey and conduct a test comparing attrition between a rapid data approach and a more traditional longer-term follow up approach.
Suggested Citation
McCauley, Erin J. & Gibbons, Alexandra & Wildeman, Christopher & McKay, Tasseli, 2026.
"Retaining Hard-to-engage populations in longitudinal studies: a research note on rapid data collection with former foster care youth in NYC,"
Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:185:y:2026:i:c:s0190740926001970
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108944
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:185:y:2026:i:c:s0190740926001970. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.