IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v185y2026ics0190740926001866.html

“Not an option”: How mothers with limited incomes view barriers to child care use for infants and toddlers

Author

Listed:
  • Hoiting, Jill
  • Halpern-Meekin, Sarah
  • Magnuson, Katherine

Abstract

Although early care and education offers benefits for child development and supports parental workforce participation, many families with low incomes do not use such care for their young children. The present study explores how mothers with limited financial resources in two metropolitan areas in the US view nonparental care for their infants and toddlers. In addition to common cost barriers, mistrust shapes mothers’ broader decisions about whether to use any child care. Mothers contend with a generalized sense of mistrust in child care settings that is contingent on their child’s development. They anticipate the need to verify the safety of their children and consider their options for doing so. These findings have implications for early childhood policy, including policy aimed at increasing access to child care.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoiting, Jill & Halpern-Meekin, Sarah & Magnuson, Katherine, 2026. "“Not an option”: How mothers with limited incomes view barriers to child care use for infants and toddlers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:185:y:2026:i:c:s0190740926001866
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108933
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740926001866
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108933?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:185:y:2026:i:c:s0190740926001866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.