IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v184y2026ics0190740926001337.html

Connections count: how adaptive coping links supportive relationships to military adolescents’ wellbeing

Author

Listed:
  • Richardson, Evin W.
  • O’Neal, Catherine W.

Abstract

Guided by the theory of developmental contextualism and Weiss’ (1969) fund of sociability hypothesis, this analysis of 1,011 adolescents in military families examines the associations between both family and non-family supportive relationships and their psychosocial wellbeing outcomes (i.e., school engagement, depressive symptoms, anxiety, and self-efficacy) and the role of adaptive coping as a linking mechanism explaining how relationships are connected to military adolescents’ wellbeing. Both family and non-family supportive relationships were associated with more adaptive coping and, in turn, adaptive coping was generally associated with greater psychosocial wellbeing. Further, coping served as a linking mechanism between miliary adolescents’ family and non-family supportive relationships and their wellbeing outcomes. These findings highlight (1) the importance of supportive relationships both inside and outside of the family and (2) the need for services and resources for military adolescents to help them develop and maintain a variety of positive, supportive relationships and learn adaptive coping skills.

Suggested Citation

  • Richardson, Evin W. & O’Neal, Catherine W., 2026. "Connections count: how adaptive coping links supportive relationships to military adolescents’ wellbeing," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:184:y:2026:i:c:s0190740926001337
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740926001337
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108880?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:184:y:2026:i:c:s0190740926001337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.