IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v182y2026ics0190740926000393.html

Best practice vs. reality: An exploratory study of communication dynamics during forensic dental and medical examinations in child abuse investigations

Author

Listed:
  • Ko, Hayley Manalang
  • Baugerud, Gunn Astrid
  • Johnson, Miriam S.
  • Köpp, Unni-Mette Stamnes
  • Szyszko Hovden, Ewa A.

Abstract

Forensic health examinations are a routine part of child abuse investigations, yet healthcare professionals may lack the skills required to communicate effectively with victims. Best practice interviewing techniques have been adopted in various professions, yet they have not been widely implemented among healthcare professionals. Little is known about the communication dynamics during forensic health examinations in relation to best practice interviewing principles. Participants included nine youths (aged 13–16) and eight healthcare professionals involved in forensic dental and medical examinations carried out as part of child abuse investigations. Using a hybrid content analysis approach supplemented by inductive coding, healthcare professionals’ utterances were coded to identify the use of open-ended or closed-ended statements. Children’s responses were categorised as descriptive, “don’t know,” or yes/no. The length of each utterance or response was measured by word count. Preliminary revealed that healthcare professionals primarily used option-posing utterances, while invitations were used in only 0.6% of cases. Conversations also lacked a clear structure, with key components such as introductory statements and ground rules inconsistently applied. This study highlights the need to establish best practice interviewing techniques tailored for healthcare settings. Given their crucial role in child abuse investigations, healthcare professionals should receive training in evidence-based communication strategies. Implementing structured interviewing protocols in medical and dental contexts could improve information gathering while ensuring child-centred, ethical, and supportive interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ko, Hayley Manalang & Baugerud, Gunn Astrid & Johnson, Miriam S. & Köpp, Unni-Mette Stamnes & Szyszko Hovden, Ewa A., 2026. "Best practice vs. reality: An exploratory study of communication dynamics during forensic dental and medical examinations in child abuse investigations," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:182:y:2026:i:c:s0190740926000393
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740926000393
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108786?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeanne Gubbels & Mark Assink & Peter Prinzie & Claudia E. van der Put, 2021. "Why Healthcare and Education Professionals Underreport Suspicions of Child Abuse: A Qualitative Study," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Bitterly, T. Bradford & Schweitzer, Maurice E., 2019. "The impression management benefits of humorous self-disclosures: How humor influences perceptions of veracity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 73-89.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wald, Kristina A. & Chaudhry, Shereen J. & Risen, Jane L., 2024. "The credibility dilemma: When acknowledging a (perceived) lack of credibility can make a boast more believable," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    2. Fang, David & Maglio, Sam J., 2024. "On time or on thin ice: How deadline violations negatively affect perceived work quality and worker evaluations," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. Hoang, Chi & Knöferle, Klemens & Warlop, Luk, 2023. "Using different advertising humor appeals to generate firm-level warmth and competence impressions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 741-759.
    4. Ling Tan & Yongli Wang & Hailing Lu, 2022. "Leader Humor Extends beyond Work: how and when Followers Have Better Family Lives," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(1), pages 351-374, February.
    5. Evelyne C. P. Offerman & Michiel W. Asselman & Floor Bolling & Petra Helmond & Geert-Jan J. M. Stams & Ramón J. L. Lindauer, 2022. "Prevalence of Adverse Childhood Experiences in Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders in Special Education Schools from a Multi-Informant Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-28, March.
    6. Wang, Feng & Li, Weifeng & Feng, Yuan & Ren, YingWei & Chen, Yang & Xiao, Huilin, 2024. "Political skill amplifies the beneficial effects of leader humor on actors’ work engagement via psychological capital," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    7. Kaori Baba & Yaeko Kataoka, 2023. "An E-Learning Program for Continuing Midwifery Education on Handling High-Risk Abuse Cases: A Pretest–Posttest Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-12, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:182:y:2026:i:c:s0190740926000393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.