IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v182y2026ics0190740926000290.html

Measurement invariance of the anxious protection subscale the short version of the multidimensional overprotective parenting scale (AP-s-MOPS) in Chinese and Belgian adolescents

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Long
  • Heel, Martijn Van
  • Azadfar, Zahra
  • Petegem, Stijn Van
  • Wang, Lijun
  • Wang, Ying
  • Baetens, Imke

Abstract

The Anxious Protection dimension of the Short Version of the Multidimensional Overprotective Parenting Scale (AP-s-MOPS) has been widely used to assess adolescent-perceived over-parenting, yet its measurement invariance has not been tested explicitly so far. In this light, the present cross-cultural longitudinal study first examined the AP-s-MOPS’s original factor structure and then tested its invariance across countries (i.e., China and Belgium), across types of relationship (i.e., father-child and mother-child relationships) and across meso-timescales. We further investigated mean-level difference in over-parenting when scalar invariance was established. Using data from a three-wave longitudinal study (with three-month intervals) involving 809 adolescents: 73.7% Chinese (N = 596, Mage = 15.05, SD = 1.27, 48.2% boys) and 26.3% Belgian adolescents (N = 213, Mage = 14.22, SD = 1.57, 55.0% boys), the results of confirmatory factor analyses provided support for the one-factor structure of the AP-s-MOPS in Chinese and Belgian sample. We found that partial scalar invariance for the mother-child and father-child relationship across China and Belgium at the first time point, full scalar invariance at subsequent time points, and full scalar invariance across father-child and mother-child relationships at each time point. Furthermore, the AP-s-MOPS exhibited partial scalar invariance over time for the mother-child relationship in China, full metric invariance over time for the father-child relationship in China, and full scalar invariance over time for all two types of relationship in Belgium. Finally, mean-level difference test suggested that adolescents reported higher levels of maternal over-parenting compared to paternal over-parenting, while there was no evidence for significant mean-level differences between China and Belgium or across time. The present research supported the AP-s-MOPS as a reliable instrument for cross-cultural and meso-longitudinal research on over-parenting.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Long & Heel, Martijn Van & Azadfar, Zahra & Petegem, Stijn Van & Wang, Lijun & Wang, Ying & Baetens, Imke, 2026. "Measurement invariance of the anxious protection subscale the short version of the multidimensional overprotective parenting scale (AP-s-MOPS) in Chinese and Belgian adolescents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:182:y:2026:i:c:s0190740926000290
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740926000290
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108776?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:182:y:2026:i:c:s0190740926000290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.