Author
Listed:
- Teixeira, Sandra Liliana
- Rodrigues, Pedro F.S.
- Caetano, Ana Paula
- Bártolo, Ana
Abstract
This scoping review synthesizes the self-reported needs, preferences, and experiences of multi-challenged families with children regarding psychosocial support interventions. Using the Population–Concept–Context (PCC) framework and Arksey and O’Malley’s methodology, a systematic search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, and ERIC for peer-reviewed studies from 2013 to 2025. Eligible studies focused on families facing multiple long-term difficulties with children up to 18 years old and explored family perspectives on psychosocial care. The review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines for transparency and rigor. Ten studies met inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis identified insights across three domains: intervention content, delivery approaches, and intervention context and structure. Key findings highlight the importance of contextual factors, especially home-based care, valued for accessibility, personalization, and support of daily routines. Results emphasize the need for coordinated, flexible, strengths-based support that respects family agency and addresses contextual barriers. Engaging children directly with age-appropriate, playful methods enhances their participation and expression. Training families in assertiveness, communication, and problem-solving emerged as essential for empowerment and intervention success. These findings underscore aligning professional practices with the lived realities and voices of multi-challenged families. Future research should prioritize participatory methodologies involving both families and children in the co-design and evaluation of interventions to enhance relevance, responsiveness, and effectiveness.
Suggested Citation
Teixeira, Sandra Liliana & Rodrigues, Pedro F.S. & Caetano, Ana Paula & Bártolo, Ana, 2026.
"“Between challenges and opportunities”: needs and preferences in the psychosocial support of multi-challenged families with children – a scoping review,"
Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:181:y:2026:i:c:s0190740925006206
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108737
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:181:y:2026:i:c:s0190740925006206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.