Author
Listed:
- Breidenbach, Andrew L.
- Heinz, Hailey
- Acharya, Bibek
- Jimenez, Elizabeth Yakes
Abstract
Subsidized child care is beneficial for families and children, yet a low proportion of eligible families enroll in subsidy programs. This study evaluated characteristics of users and non-users of child care subsidies, reasons non-applicants cited for not applying for the program, and variation in reasons for non-application by participant characteristics. Four hundred and seventy-nine families recruited in 2022 at Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) clinics in New Mexico completed a survey. Subsidy uptake was more likely among respondents with greater educational attainment and those living in urban areas, and was less likely for Native American respondents. Knowledge barriers, including lack of awareness about the subsidy program or its eligibility criteria, were cited most often as reasons respondents did not apply for child care subsidies. Respondents who were not working or in school were more likely to say they had not applied because they did not want or need care, while respondents living in rural areas and those with at least one immigrant in the household were more likely to say they did not apply because they had not heard of the program. The study took place in New Mexico during a period of expansive subsidy eligibility and availability, adding novel insights into families’ perceptions about the burdens and benefits of program participation in the absence of rationing or scarcity. Findings point to the importance of subsidy program outreach and education to reduce learning costs, particularly in predominantly rural, Native American, and immigrant communities.
Suggested Citation
Breidenbach, Andrew L. & Heinz, Hailey & Acharya, Bibek & Jimenez, Elizabeth Yakes, 2025.
"Why don’t families apply for child care subsidies? Results from a survey of subsidy users and non-users in New Mexico,"
Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:179:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925005304
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108647
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:179:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925005304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.