IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v179y2025ics0190740925005109.html

Working toward reunification as a case goal: does family structure matter?

Author

Listed:
  • LaBrenz, Catherine
  • Shipe, Stacey
  • Panisch, Lisa S.
  • Wisdom, Damone
  • Pelletier, Tasha
  • Childress, Saltanat
  • Rodgers, Ann Hunt
  • Mecca-McClory, Christina

Abstract

Despite an increase in single father-headed households, few studies have examined how single fathers fare in child welfare. This study examined the relationship between family structure and reunification as a case goal, and the moderating role of child race/ethnicity. Data came from the 2019 Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System, a national database of all children in foster care in the United States during any point in the fiscal year. The analytic sample included 234,075 children who entered foster care in FY 2019. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine whether family structure was associated with an initial case goal of reunification, while adjusting for other factors such as child age, sex, race/ethnicity, and removal causes. In the final model, an interaction term between race/ethnicity and family structure was added. Children whose parents were married (AOR = 1.18, 95 % CI = 1.13–1.23), partnered (AOR = 1.17, 95 % CI = 1.12–1.22) or who entered foster care from a single mother household (AOR = 1.16, 95 % CI = 1.12–1.21) had higher odds of reunification as an initial case goal than their peers who entered care from a single father household. Child race/ethnicity significantly moderated this relationship. Our findings highlighted an intersection of family structure and race/ethnicity that impacts reunification as an initial case goal for children entering foster care. This highlights an urgent need for culturally responsive services that target fathers broadly to engage in child welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • LaBrenz, Catherine & Shipe, Stacey & Panisch, Lisa S. & Wisdom, Damone & Pelletier, Tasha & Childress, Saltanat & Rodgers, Ann Hunt & Mecca-McClory, Christina, 2025. "Working toward reunification as a case goal: does family structure matter?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:179:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925005109
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925005109
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108627?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Choi, Sam & Ryan, Joseph P., 2007. "Co-occurring problems for substance abusing mothers in child welfare: Matching services to improve family reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(11), pages 1395-1410, November.
    2. Lawrence M. Berger & Sarah A. Font & Kristen S. Slack & Jane Waldfogel, 2017. "Income and child maltreatment in unmarried families: evidence from the earned income tax credit," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1345-1372, December.
    3. Nievar, M. Angela & Ramisetty-Mikler, Suhasini & Saleh, Mahasin F. & Cabrera, Natasha, 2020. "Families Offering Children Unfailing Support (FOCUS) Fatherhood Program: Changing child welfare through child support and parenting skills," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    4. Campbell, Christina A. & Howard, Douglas & Rayford, Brett S. & Gordon, Derrick M., 2015. "Fathers matter: involving and engaging fathers in the child welfare system process," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 84-91.
    5. Marsh, Jeanne C. & Ryan, Joseph P. & Choi, Sam & Testa, Mark F., 2006. "Integrated services for families with multiple problems: Obstacles to family reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(9), pages 1074-1087, September.
    6. D'Andrade, Amy C. & Chambers, Ruth M., 2012. "Parental problems, case plan requirements, and service targeting in child welfare reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 2131-2138.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, Tyrone C. & Lo, Celia C., 2020. "Receipt of substance-use services by caregivers involved in the child-welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    2. Shdaimah, Corey S., 2009. ""CPS is not a housing agency"; Housing is a CPS problem: Towards a definition and typology of housing problems in child welfare cases," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 211-218, February.
    3. Havlicek, Judy, 2021. "Systematic review of birth parent–foster youth relationships before and after aging out of foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Mowbray, Orion & Ryan, Joseph P. & Victor, Bryan G. & Bushman, Gregory & Yochum, Clayton & Perron, Brian E., 2017. "Longitudinal trends in substance use and mental health service needs in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1-8.
    5. Johnson-Motoyama, Michelle & Brook, Jody & Yan, Yueqi & McDonald, Thomas P., 2013. "Cost analysis of the strengthening families program in reducing time to family reunification among substance-affected families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 244-252.
    6. Grant, Therese & Christopher Graham, J. & Ernst, Cara C. & Michelle Peavy, K. & Brown, Natalie Novick, 2014. "Improving pregnancy outcomes among high-risk mothers who abuse alcohol and drugs: Factors associated with subsequent exposed births," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 11-18.
    7. Dauber, Sarah & Neighbors, Charles & Dasaro, Chris & Riordan, Annette & Morgenstern, Jon, 2012. "Impact of intensive case management on child welfare system involvement for substance-dependent parenting women on public assistance," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1359-1366.
    8. Chambers, Ruth M. & Brocato, Jo & Fatemi, Maryam & Rodriguez, Angel Y., 2016. "An innovative child welfare pilot initiative: Results and outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 143-151.
    9. Grant, Therese & Huggins, Janet & Graham, J. Christopher & Ernst, Cara & Whitney, Nancy & Wilson, Dee, 2011. "Maternal substance abuse and disrupted parenting: Distinguishing mothers who keep their children from those who do not," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2176-2185.
    10. Yampolskaya, Svetlana & Sharrock, Patty & Armstrong, Mary I. & Strozier, Anne & Swanke, Jayme, 2014. "Profile of children placed in out-of-home care: Association with permanency outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 195-200.
    11. LaBrenz, Catherine A. & Lloyd Sieger, Margaret & Choi, Mijin & Harrell, Danielle R. & Findley, Erin & Robinson, Erica D. & Baiden, Philip, 2023. "Family support services and reunification across diverse racial/ethnic groups: A survival analysis utilizing administrative child welfare data," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    12. Reich, Warren A. & Fuger, Kathryn L., 2012. "Accessing child developmental services predicts in-home placement of substance- and HIV-affected children," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2474-2480.
    13. Lin, Yu-An & Hedeker, Donald & Ryan, Joseph P. & Marsh, Jeanne C., 2020. "Longitudinal analysis of need-service matching for substance-involved parents in the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    14. Jedwab, Merav & Chatterjee, Anusha & Shaw, Terry V., 2018. "Caseworkers' insights and experiences with successful reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 56-63.
    15. Pine, Barbara A. & Spath, Robin & Werrbach, Gail B. & Jenson, Cary E. & Kerman, Benjamin, 2009. "A better path to permanency for children in out-of-home care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 1135-1143, October.
    16. Cheng, Tyrone C. & Lo, Celia C., 2018. "Racial disparities in the proportion of needed services maltreated children received," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 72-81.
    17. Lloyd Sieger, Margaret & Becker, Jessica & Philips, Jon & Lee, Jung Wun & Moore, Timothy E., 2023. "Latent classes among substance-involved families in child welfare: Associations with treatment completion and reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    18. Thoburn, June & Cooper, Neil & Brandon, Marian & Connolly, Sara, 2013. "The place of “think family” approaches in child and family social work: Messages from a process evaluation of an English pathfinder service," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 228-236.
    19. Amelia M. Biehl & Brian Hill, 2018. "Foster care and the earned income tax credit," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 661-680, September.
    20. Radney, Angelise & Lee, Joyce Y. & Xu, Amy & Steinke, Hannah R. & Mengo, Cecilia & Johnson-Motoyama, Michelle, 2024. "Racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare utilization among children in U.S. foster care: Recommendations to challenge the status quo based on a scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:179:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925005109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.