IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v178y2025ics0190740925004372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of parent advocacy type on child protection case conference intervention decisions: a vignette study

Author

Listed:
  • Alfandari, Ravit
  • Simhon, Ori Ben
  • Enosh, Guy

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of three parent advocacy types—self-advocacy, independent legal advocacy by a lawyer, and independent nonprofessional advocacy by a parent’s neighbor—on social workers’ intervention decisions in formal child protection case conferences. We used an experimental survey design including vignettes that manipulated the identity of the person who voiced the parent’s wishes about solutions for the family. Data were collected from 170 social workers via online questionnaire. Findings show independent nonprofessional advocacy had a significant effect on decision making, increasing the odds that social workers would select out-of-home placement intervention, against the parent’s wishes, compared to cases of self-advocacy. No such effect was found for independent legal advocacy. To conclude, independent advocacy should not be practiced nonprofessionally, because it may lead to unfavorable outcomes for parents. Beneficial independent advocacy should shed light on social workers’ informal expectations of parents.

Suggested Citation

  • Alfandari, Ravit & Simhon, Ori Ben & Enosh, Guy, 2025. "The impact of parent advocacy type on child protection case conference intervention decisions: a vignette study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:178:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925004372
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925004372
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:178:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925004372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.