IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v177y2025ics0190740925003846.html

Deeply navigating among cross-cultural issues makes you a better expert

Author

Listed:
  • Melinder, Annika
  • Lekva, Karine Bakke
  • Fosse, Hulda Rødder

Abstract

The European Court of Human Rights underscores the importance of cultural and ethnic aspects in experts’ evaluations of child protective services cases. However, little is known about whether the degree of justification of their conclusions and the quality of expert reports differ as a function of the case’s ethnicity. We explored whether experts who examine nonethnic Scandinavian (NES) vs. ethnic Scandinavian (ES) cases differ in terms of justifying their conclusions and producing high-quality reports. A total of 306 reports (n = 124 NES) were collected after reliability testing (α ≥ 0.81) and coded for ‘Justifying’ and ‘Quality’ variables. ANOVA did not show significant differences between the NES and ES groups in terms of justification (p = 0.84), but when the NES group was divided into yes/no regarding the discussion of ethnic issues, ANOVA showed that the discussed NES group was superior in terms of justification to the not discussed NES group (p = 0.01), but not compared to the ES group (p = 0.88). For the quality variables, no differences were detected between the NES and ES groups (p ≥ 0.08). When the discussed NES group was compared with the ES group, we found a difference in the ‘quality of evaluation’ between the discussed NES group and the not discussed NES group (p = 0.02). The rating scores of the experts’ conduct and behavior did not differ. Only experts who discussed ethnic issues in their work with NES cases had higher scores on the justification and quality measures. Examining NES cases without discussing issues of ethnicity might be a risk factor for worse justification and lower quality in experts’ reports in child protective services cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Melinder, Annika & Lekva, Karine Bakke & Fosse, Hulda Rødder, 2025. "Deeply navigating among cross-cultural issues makes you a better expert," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:177:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925003846
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925003846
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108501?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pearsol, James A., 1987. "Justifying conclusions in naturalistic evaluations: An interpretive perspective," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 335-341, January.
    2. Pearsol, James A., 1987. "Justifying conclusions in naturalistic evaluations: Introduction to special section," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 307-308, January.
    3. Dovidio, J.F. & Fiske, S.T., 2012. "Under the radar: How unexamined biases in decision-making processes in clinical interactions can contribute to health care disparities," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(5), pages 945-952.
    4. Eirinn Hesvik Ljones & Øivin Christiansen & Marte Knag Fylkesnes, 2025. "A Space for Motherhood? Contact Visits from the Perspectives of Mothers with Migration Experiences," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erin A. Cech & William R. Rothwell, 2020. "LGBT Workplace Inequality in the Federal Workforce: Intersectional Processes, Organizational Contexts, and Turnover Considerations," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 73(1), pages 25-60, January.
    2. Harnois, Catherine E. & Bastos, João L. & Campbell, Mary E. & Keith, Verna M., 2019. "Measuring perceived mistreatment across diverse social groups: An evaluation of the Everyday Discrimination Scale," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 298-306.
    3. Stijn Schelfhout & Robin Vandecasteele & Stéphanie De Maesschalck & Fanny D’hondt & Sara Willems & Eva Derous, 2022. "Intercultural Competence Predicts Intercultural Effectiveness: Test of an Integrative Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Anu Kasmel & Pernille Tanggaard, 2011. "Conceptualizing Organizational Domains of Community Empowerment through Empowerment Evaluation in Estonian Communities," Societies, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-27, June.
    5. Gordon B Moskowitz & Irmak Olcaysoy Okten & Cynthia M Gooch, 2017. "Distortion in time perception as a result of concern about appearing biased," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:177:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925003846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.