Author
Listed:
- Pinto, Rita
- Canário, Catarina
- Leijten, Patty
- Rodrigo, Maria José
- Cruz, Orlanda
Abstract
Parenting programs can improve parenting practices and children’s behavior and are a key strategy in child protection services. Yet, little is known about how receiving these programs relates to families’ recurrence in child protection services over time. We examined the association between the dosage received of Standard Triple P and the child protection case closure 12 months after program completion or dropout. Additionally, we explored whether completing the program would relate to case closure compared to those who dropped out. Participants are 74 Portuguese families with children aged 6 to 12 involved with the child protection system. Families were referred to receive Standard Triple P, of which 30 families (41 %) completed it and 44 (59 %) did not complete this intervention. Families received, on average, five sessions of Standard Triple P (SD = 3.89). Families who received a higher dosage of the intervention were more likely to have their child protection case closed one year later. Similarly, results suggest an association between completing the intervention and having the child protection case closed one year later. The rate of families who complete the intervention increases up to 3 months post-intervention and remains stable until 12 months post-intervention. Our findings seem to suggest that evidence-based parenting programs’ dosage and completion are associated with an increased likelihood of case closure. This may guide decisions within the child protection system about which approaches are more likely to provide effective support to children and families.
Suggested Citation
Pinto, Rita & Canário, Catarina & Leijten, Patty & Rodrigo, Maria José & Cruz, Orlanda, 2025.
"Families’ involvement with the child protection system in Portugal: A one-year follow-up study on case closure after receiving an evidence-based parenting program,"
Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:176:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925003007
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108417
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:176:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925003007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.