IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v176y2025ics0190740925002816.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Family and professionalism in foster families

Author

Listed:
  • Brink, Ida Ofelia
  • Reimer, Daniela

Abstract

In many countries, there is a distinction between traditional and professional foster families. This distinction is laden with tension since traditional and professional foster families are not treated as equals regarding remuneration, recognition and support. This situation raises questions about professionalization in the field of foster care. The article takes an approach that defines professionalization more broadly than the formal qualification of foster families. Using three contrasting and multi-perspective case analyses based on data from a project funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation on the topic “Images of foster families and their impact on cooperation processes in foster care”, the article reconstructs the different understandings of professionalism and the mindsets behind them, as well as the effects on family life and on the way children’s needs are met. It is argued that foster families are challenged to balance familial and professional actions which are at times incompatible. This incompatibility requires an assessment, which is approached in the article with reflexive professionalism and the analysis of paradoxes.

Suggested Citation

  • Brink, Ida Ofelia & Reimer, Daniela, 2025. "Family and professionalism in foster families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:176:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925002816
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925002816
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108398?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:176:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925002816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.