IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v176y2025ics0190740925002592.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

National insights into the stress and well-being of Early Head Start families before and after the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Abdul-Masih, Maria Y.
  • Ansari, Arya
  • Purtell, Kelly M.

Abstract

Early Head Start (EHS) is a program designed to address the unique needs of low-income families. However, little is known about how the stress and well-being of EHS families has changed pre- and post-COVID-19. This information is vital for supporting families and addressing their changing needs. To fill this gap, we used data from the Early Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey (Baby FACES), which are nationally representative samples of children and families served by EHS in 2018 (n = 2,826) and 2022 (n = 1,477). Using these two cohorts of cross-sectional data, we examined how families’ experiences with stress and well-being differed in the cohorts pre- and post-pandemic and across different demographic and household characteristics. Results from covariate-adjusted regression analyses revealed that EHS families in the 2022 cohort reported less social support, more depressive symptoms, and increased parenting stress, but fewer financial strains compared with families in the 2018 cohort. These findings varied consistently by race/ethnicity and primary home language. Hispanic families and those whose primary language was something other than English at home fared better than White and English-only families post pandemic. Overall, this study provides insight into the changing stress and well-being of EHS families over time, which is critical for ensuring families from vulnerable communities are receiving adequate resources to meet their needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdul-Masih, Maria Y. & Ansari, Arya & Purtell, Kelly M., 2025. "National insights into the stress and well-being of Early Head Start families before and after the COVID-19 pandemic," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:176:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925002592
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925002592
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:176:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925002592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.