Author
Listed:
- Yuan, Wen
- Cao, Juan
- Liu, Zheng
- Zhang, Xuran
- Liu, Lisha
- Guo, Hui
- Li, Yanfang
Abstract
Bullying is not only an individual behavior, but also a dynamic network that emerges through the complex process of changing ties between bullies and victims. Longitudinal research on bullying network and social status was limited. This study aimed to examine the social status of four types of bullying roles and the dynamic interplay between social status and bullying network. The study involved 965 students (52.1 % boys) from 22 fourth- and fifth-grade classes in China, spanning the years 2020 and 2021. To construct bullying networks and gauge social status, participants completed peer nomination questionnaires. Multi-level model and stochastic actor-oriented model were used to construct binary and ternary network effects. The results showed that bystanders emerged with the highest social status, while those occupying the bully/victim role had the lowest. Concerning social acceptance status, the ego effect was not significant (Est = −0.08, p > 0.05), but the alter effect was significant (Est = −0.19, p < 0.05). That is, children with high social preference trended to decrease bullying ties, yet their victimization ties will not significantly change. For social preference status, the ego effect was significant (Est = −0.21, p < 0.05), while the alter effect was not significant (Est = −0.04, p > 0.05). That is, children with high social acceptance trended to decrease victimization ties, but their bullying ties remain relatively unchanged. This study contributes to our understanding of bullying as a group process and the associations with social status, and provides implications for preventing school bullying.
Suggested Citation
Yuan, Wen & Cao, Juan & Liu, Zheng & Zhang, Xuran & Liu, Lisha & Guo, Hui & Li, Yanfang, 2025.
"The dynamic interplay between social status and children’s bullying network: A longitudinal social network analysis,"
Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:174:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925002130
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108330
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:174:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925002130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.