IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v121y2021ics0190740920323239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of The Sanctuary Model in residential out-of-home care: Enablers, barriers, successes and challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Galvin, Emma
  • Morris, Heather
  • Mousa, Aya
  • O'Donnell, Renee
  • Halfpenny, Nick
  • Skouteris, Helen

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the enablers, barriers, organisational successes and challenges experienced by decision makers (managers and executive staff) when implementing The Sanctuary Model, a trauma-informed, organisation-wide model in residential out-of-home care. Following ethics approval, nine semi-structured interviews were conducted between September 2018 and February 2019. Data were thematically analysed and four enablers for implementing The Sanctuary Model in residential care were identified: (1) shared trauma-informed knowledge and understanding; (2) leadership and champions; (3) structures; and (4) creativity and flexibility. Three barriers of implementation were recognised: (1) infidelity of the model; (2) lack of practice-based and refresher training; and (3) poor resources. The successes experienced during implementation were presented as: (1) the Sanctuary commitments; (2) the SELF framework; and (3) reflective practice. One prominent challenge presented across managers and executive staff was the relevance to staff and young people. Key findings indicate that when implementing The Sanctuary Model, organisations need to commit to organisational and behavioural change by providing resources, hands on support, and ongoing practice-based and refresher training, all of which consistently promote incorporating The Sanctuary Model into practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Galvin, Emma & Morris, Heather & Mousa, Aya & O'Donnell, Renee & Halfpenny, Nick & Skouteris, Helen, 2021. "Implementation of The Sanctuary Model in residential out-of-home care: Enablers, barriers, successes and challenges," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:121:y:2021:i:c:s0190740920323239
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740920323239
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105901?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:121:y:2021:i:c:s0190740920323239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.