IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v105y2019ic14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Therapeutic transformation of juvenile corrections in Virginia: A mixed method analysis of benefits and challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Cleary, Hayley M.D.
  • Brubaker, Sarah Jane

Abstract

Many juvenile correctional institutions have moved toward a punitive, adult-like management model that prioritizes security and control. In recent years, Virginia has reinstituted a rehabilitative approach in its juvenile facilities via the Community Treatment Model, a therapeutic model of youth corrections similar to the Missouri Model that emphasizes relationship building, community and family connections, and group- based treatment and accountability. Despite the tremendous investment involved, evaluations of therapeutic correctional programs are rare. This article reports findings from a mixed-method, mid-implementation assessment of perceived benefits and challenges with Virginia's model. We conducted 18 focus groups and 248 surveys with incarcerated youth and facility staff. Perceived program benefits included regular, structured activities; increased family engagement; and improved staff-youth relationships facilitated by consistent staffing and efforts to build rapport. Participants identified forced interactions; youth resistance to talking- focused activities; insufficient accountability mechanisms; implementation problems; and questions regarding universal applicability as challenges with the new model.

Suggested Citation

  • Cleary, Hayley M.D. & Brubaker, Sarah Jane, 2019. "Therapeutic transformation of juvenile corrections in Virginia: A mixed method analysis of benefits and challenges," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-1.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:105:y:2019:i:c:14
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740919304220
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:105:y:2019:i:c:14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.