Comparison among run order algorithms for sequential factorial experiments
Four algorithms for sequencing runs of the 2n factorial experiment are compared according to the two criteria: the number of factor level changes (i.e. cost) and the time trend resistance. These algorithms are: Correa et al. (2009), Cui and John (1998), Cheng and Jacroux (1988) and Coster and Cheng (1988), referred to here as Algorithms I, II, III (a and b) and IV, respectively. The comparison includes also the identification of whether a run order of one algorithm can equivalently be generated by another algorithm.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:58:y:2013:i:c:p:397-406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.