IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v52y2008i12p5229-5241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Test of independence in a 22 contingency table with nonignorable nonresponse via constrained EM algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Takai, Keiji
  • Kano, Yutaka

Abstract

Test of independence for 22 contingency tables with nonignorable nonresponses is discussed. Dependency assumption between two observed outcomes is required to achieve identification in many models with nonignorable nonresponses in the analysis of 22 contingency tables (e.g., [Ma, W.-Q., Geng, Z., Li, X.-T., 2003. Identification of nonresponse mechanisms for two-way contingency tables. Behaviormetrika 30, 125-144]). The assumption is, however, violated under the null hypothesis when implementing the test of independence. In this article, we introduce a new simple assumption to achieve identification. The assumption involves pre-specified parameters. EM algorithms for finding the MLE are numerically unstable when there are nonlinear constraints, which are created by models treating nonignorable nonresponses. In the analysis of contingency tables, estimated values often fall outside the admissible region. We propose a new EM type algorithm to stably calculate the constrained MLE, and apply it to make the test of independence for a real data set (crime data). We compare empirical performance among several testing procedures for independence. It turns out that the new EM type algorithm works well to calculate the MLE, and that the nonignorable model with the correctly specified parameters performs best while the conventional chi-square test of independence works fairly well.

Suggested Citation

  • Takai, Keiji & Kano, Yutaka, 2008. "Test of independence in a 22 contingency table with nonignorable nonresponse via constrained EM algorithm," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(12), pages 5229-5241, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:52:y:2008:i:12:p:5229-5241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(08)00241-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glonek, G. F. V., 1999. "On identifiability in models for incomplete binary data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 191-197, January.
    2. Kadane, Joseph B., 1985. "Is victimization chronic? a Bayesian analysis of multinomial missing data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1-2), pages 47-67.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kenneth J. Wilkins & Garrett M. Fitzmaurice, 2006. "A Hybrid Model for Nonignorable Dropout in Longitudinal Binary Responses," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 168-176, March.
    2. Li, Huiqiong & Tian, Guoliang & Tang, Niansheng & Cao, Hongyuan, 2018. "Assessing non-inferiority for incomplete paired-data under non-ignorable missing mechanism," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 69-81.
    3. Ma, Wen-Qing & Geng, Zhi & Hu, Yong-Hua, 2003. "Identification of graphical models for nonignorable nonresponse of binary outcomes in longitudinal studies," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 24-45, October.
    4. Miller, J. Mitchell & Koons-Witt, Barbara A. & Ventura, Holly E., 2004. "Barriers to evaluating the effectiveness of drug treatment behind bars," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 75-83.
    5. Catania, Leopoldo & Di Mari, Roberto, 2021. "Hierarchical Markov-switching models for multivariate integer-valued time-series," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 118-137.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:52:y:2008:i:12:p:5229-5241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.