IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v201y2025ip2s0960077925012688.html

Strategy dependent time delays shape cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamadichamgavi, Javad

Abstract

Understanding how temporal aspects of decision-making influence cooperation in structured populations is crucial for explaining the emergence of cooperative behavior in nature and society. While spatial reciprocity has long been known to support cooperation by allowing cooperators to form protective clusters, the role of time delays, particularly those dependent on strategy choice, remains underexplored. Here, we investigate the effects of strategy-dependent time delays on cooperation dynamics in the weak Prisoner’s Dilemma game on square lattices. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we show that time delays can profoundly alter cooperation levels and spatial patterns. Our results reveal that asymmetries in delays can induce transitions between full cooperation, coexistence, and full defection. Also we show that strategy-dependent delays primarily alter the clustering dynamics of cooperators, which in turn drives the changes in overall cooperation behavior. We further show that the type of Prisoner’s Dilemma (weak or standard) influences only the quantitative level of cooperation, while the qualitative effect of delays remains unchanged.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamadichamgavi, Javad, 2025. "Strategy dependent time delays shape cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 201(P2).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:201:y:2025:i:p2:s0960077925012688
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077925012688
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117255?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Tao & Chen, Zhigang & Li, Kenli & Deng, Xiaoheng & Li, Deng, 2014. "Memory does not necessarily promote cooperation in dilemma games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 395(C), pages 218-227.
    2. Zhao, Jinqiu & Luo, Chao, 2019. "The effect of preferential teaching and memory on cooperation clusters in interdependent networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 363(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Du, Wen-Bo & Cao, Xian-Bin & Zhao, Lin & Hu, Mao-Bin, 2009. "Evolutionary games on scale-free networks with a preferential selection mechanism," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(20), pages 4509-4514.
    4. Ren, Guangming & Wang, Xingyuan, 2014. "Robustness of cooperation in memory-based prisoner’s dilemma game on a square lattice," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 408(C), pages 40-46.
    5. Aming Li & Lei Zhou & Qi Su & Sean P. Cornelius & Yang-Yu Liu & Long Wang & Simon A. Levin, 2020. "Evolution of cooperation on temporal networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Johannes Knebel & Markus F. Weber & Torben Krüger & Erwin Frey, 2015. "Evolutionary games of condensates in coupled birth–death processes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, November.
    7. Pi, Bin & Li, Yuhan & Feng, Minyu, 2022. "An evolutionary game with conformists and profiteers regarding the memory mechanism," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 597(C).
    8. Ye, Tianbo & Li, Pengcheng & Fan, Suohai, 2024. "Preferential selection based on aspiration and memory in spatial evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 647(C).
    9. Jacek Miȩkisz & Javad Mohamadichamgavi, 2025. "Intrinsic Noise in Structured Replicator Dynamics Modelling Time Delays," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1364-1377, September.
    10. Hisashi Ohtsuki & Christoph Hauert & Erez Lieberman & Martin A. Nowak, 2006. "A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7092), pages 502-505, May.
    11. Pan, Qiuhui & Shi, Shu & Zhang, Yu & He, Mingfeng, 2013. "Cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game with delayed decisions," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 166-174.
    12. Qi Su & Alexander J. Stewart, 2025. "Evolutionary dynamics of behavioral motivations for cooperation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Marek Bodnar & Jacek Miȩkisz & Raffi Vardanyan, 2020. "Three-Player Games with Strategy-Dependent Time Delays," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 664-675, September.
    14. A. Szolnoki & M. Perc, 2009. "Promoting cooperation in social dilemmas via simple coevolutionary rules," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 67(3), pages 337-344, February.
    15. Qi Su & Alex McAvoy & Yoichiro Mori & Joshua B. Plotkin, 2022. "Evolution of prosocial behaviours in multilayer populations," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(3), pages 338-348, March.
    16. Martin A. Nowak & Karl Sigmund, 2005. "Evolution of indirect reciprocity," Nature, Nature, vol. 437(7063), pages 1291-1298, October.
    17. Huang, Chaochao & Wang, Chaoqian, 2024. "Memory-based involution dilemma on square lattices," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    18. Sergi Lozano & Alex Arenas & Angel Sánchez, 2008. "Mesoscopic Structure Conditions the Emergence of Cooperation on Social Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(4), pages 1-9, April.
    19. Han, Xu & Xia, Haoxiang & Zhao, Xiaowei, 2024. "Memory–based adaptive interaction willingness enhances cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    20. Dong, Yukun & Xu, Hedong & Fan, Suohai, 2019. "Memory-based stag hunt game on regular lattices," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 519(C), pages 247-255.
    21. Luo, Chao & Zhang, Xiaolin & Liu, Hong & Shao, Rui, 2016. "Cooperation in memory-based prisoner’s dilemma game on interdependent networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 450(C), pages 560-569.
    22. Julia Poncela & Jesús Gómez-Gardeñes & Luis M Floría & Angel Sánchez & Yamir Moreno, 2008. "Complex Cooperative Networks from Evolutionary Preferential Attachment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(6), pages 1-6, June.
    23. Shu, Feng & Liu, Yaojun & Liu, Xingwen & Zhou, Xiaobing, 2019. "Memory-based conformity enhances cooperation in social dilemmas," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 346(C), pages 480-490.
    24. Liu, Yongkui & Li, Zhi & Chen, Xiaojie & Wang, Long, 2010. "Memory-based prisoner’s dilemma on square lattices," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(12), pages 2390-2396.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dong, Yukun & Xu, Hedong & Fan, Suohai, 2019. "Memory-based stag hunt game on regular lattices," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 519(C), pages 247-255.
    2. Huang, Chaochao & Wang, Chaoqian, 2024. "Memory-based involution dilemma on square lattices," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    3. Deng, Yunsheng & Zhang, Jihui, 2021. "The role of the preferred neighbor with the expected payoff on cooperation in spatial public goods game under optimal strategy selection mechanism," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 584(C).
    4. Yunsheng Deng & Jihui Zhang, 2022. "The choice-decision based on memory and payoff favors cooperation in stag hunt game on interdependent networks," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 95(2), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Pan, Qiuhui & Shi, Shu & Zhang, Yu & He, Mingfeng, 2013. "Cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game with delayed decisions," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 166-174.
    6. Ye, Wenxing & Wen, Luliang & Fan, Suohai, 2025. "Memory-based prisoner’s dilemma game with payoff-driven preferential selection," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    7. Ye, Tianbo & Li, Pengcheng & Fan, Suohai, 2024. "Preferential selection based on aspiration and memory in spatial evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 647(C).
    8. Han, Xu & Xia, Haoxiang & Zhao, Xiaowei, 2024. "Memory–based adaptive interaction willingness enhances cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    9. Huang, Linya & Zhang, Liming & Huang, Changwei & Han, Wenchen, 2025. "Synergy effect of strategy diversity and persistence promotes cooperation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. Shu, Feng & Li, Min & Liu, Xingwen, 2019. "Memory mechanism with weighting promotes cooperation in the evolutionary games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 17-24.
    11. Zhang, Gui & Xiong, Xiaojin & Pi, Bin & Feng, Minyu & Perc, Matjaž, 2025. "Spatial public goods games with queueing and reputation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 505(C).
    12. Ping Zhu & Guiyi Wei, 2014. "Stochastic Heterogeneous Interaction Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-10, April.
    13. Zhang, Yanling & Yang, Shuo & Chen, Xiaojie & Bai, Yanbing & Xie, Guangming, 2023. "Reputation update of responders efficiently promotes the evolution of fairness in the ultimatum game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    14. Lv, Ran & Qian, Jia-Li & Hao, Qing-Yi & Wu, Chao-Yun & Guo, Ning & Ling, Xiang, 2023. "The impact of current and historical reputation with non-uniform change on cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).
    15. Zhu, Jiabao & Liu, Xingwen, 2021. "The number of strategy changes can be used to promote cooperation in spatial snowdrift game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 575(C).
    16. Song, Fanpeng & Wu, Jianliang & Fan, Suohai & Jing, Fei, 2020. "Transcendental behavior and disturbance behavior favor human development," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 378(C).
    17. Yongkui Liu & Xiaojie Chen & Lin Zhang & Long Wang & Matjaž Perc, 2012. "Win-Stay-Lose-Learn Promotes Cooperation in the Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-8, February.
    18. Huang, Linya & Han, Wenchen, 2025. "Impact of heterogeneous network structures on the evolution of group behavior," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 200(P2).
    19. Pi, Bin & Li, Yuhan & Feng, Minyu, 2022. "An evolutionary game with conformists and profiteers regarding the memory mechanism," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 597(C).
    20. Yan, Zeyuan & Zhao, Hui & Liang, Shu & Li, Li & Song, Yanjie, 2024. "Inter-layer feedback mechanism with reinforcement learning boosts the evolution of cooperation in multilayer network," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:201:y:2025:i:p2:s0960077925012688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.