IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v69y2026i4p517-527.html

When ‘good’ business becomes ‘risky’ business: A look at board gender diversity in a changing environment

Author

Listed:
  • Salaiz, Ashley
  • Faifman, Leon
  • Ciarleglio, Veronika
  • Vidal, Daniel Diaz

Abstract

Since 2017, institutional investors such as BlackRock, State Street Global Advisors, and Vanguard have actively pushed publicly traded firms to increase gender diversity on their boards. However, heightened political and legal backlash in the US against diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)—especially following the 2023 US Supreme Court ruling in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard—created conflicting pressures for leaders of public companies. We examined trends in Russell 3000 Index firms’ board diversity from 2017–2025, which revealed a plateau after 2023, as firms recalibrated amid conflicting pressures. In this article, we categorize boards by gender diversity thresholds (i.e., three+, two, one-or-none) and show how firms with three+ women directors sustain performance advantages despite backlash. Applying Oliver’s 1991 framework, we identify five strategic responses—from acquiescence to defiance—and provide best practices for preserving the performance benefits of diversity in a contested landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Salaiz, Ashley & Faifman, Leon & Ciarleglio, Veronika & Vidal, Daniel Diaz, 2026. "When ‘good’ business becomes ‘risky’ business: A look at board gender diversity in a changing environment," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 517-527.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:69:y:2026:i:4:p:517-527
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2025.07.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681325001120
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2025.07.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:69:y:2026:i:4:p:517-527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.