IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v69y2026i2p209-216.html

DEI rollbacks: Consequences and considerations for brand managers

Author

Listed:
  • Sands, Sean
  • Ferraro, Carla

Abstract

As corporate landscapes evolve, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives face increasing scrutiny, with many large corporations rolling back their commitments amid sociopolitical pressures, legal uncertainties, and shifting stakeholder expectations. While such decisions may be framed as strategic recalibrations, they carry implications for brand trust, authenticity, and consumer perceptions. This article examines the consequences of DEI rollbacks from both the consumer and brand management perspectives, highlighting their impact on consumer trust, brand positioning, and corporate reputation. Drawing on contemporary examples and theoretical insights, we explore how brands can navigate these challenges while maintaining credibility and competitive advantage. We suggest that transparent communication, authenticity in brand engagement, and strategic adaptation are critical for mitigating risks associated with DEI retrenchment. For brand managers, the ability to balance external pressures with long-term brand equity considerations is essential to sustaining consumer loyalty and to fostering an inclusive corporate identity in an increasingly complex sociopolitical landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Sands, Sean & Ferraro, Carla, 2026. "DEI rollbacks: Consequences and considerations for brand managers," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 209-216.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:69:y:2026:i:2:p:209-216
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2025.02.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681325000370
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2025.02.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:69:y:2026:i:2:p:209-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.