Author
Abstract
In an age of increasing stakeholder activism, seen in movements like Fridays for Future, MeToo, and Black Lives Matter as well as demands from socially conscious consumers, companies are expanding their roles beyond corporate social responsibility (CSR) and publicly addressing contentious social and political issues via corporate social advocacy (CSA). However, as stakeholders become more divided along ideological and sociopolitical lines, CSA can often lead to backlash from polarized audiences, damaging the company’s reputation, relationships, and legitimacy. This raises the question of whether it is prudent for companies to engage in CSA in polarized times. Can companies endure potential repercussions like consumer boycotts, disaffected employees, and irate politicians and investors? This article critiques the limitations of current approaches to communicating corporate societal responsibilities and explores Stoicism—an ancient Hellenistic philosophy—as an alternative lens to answer these difficult questions. As a denomination of applied philosophy and practical ethics, Stoicism offers not only a philosophical rationale for CSA but also actionable principles to deal with agitated and divergent voices in polarized times. This article discusses four selected Stoic thoughts and provides practical advice for managers on whether and how to effectively engage in CSA amid polarized times. Recommendations include aligning CSA efforts with corporate identity, prioritizing factors within the organization’s control, remaining flexible and adaptable when encountering obstacles, and adopting reflective practice.
Suggested Citation
Dhanesh, Ganga S., 2025.
"Communicating corporate social advocacy (CSA) in polarized times: A Stoic turn from dancing to wrestling,"
Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 613-625.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:bushor:v:68:y:2025:i:5:p:613-625
DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2024.08.004
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:68:y:2025:i:5:p:613-625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.