IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/beexfi/v50y2026ics2214635026000559.html

Trust in robo-advisory services: A mixed-methods study

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Yingting
  • Aw, Eugene Cheng-Xi
  • Tan, Garry Wei-Han
  • Ki, Chung-Wha (Chloe)

Abstract

This study examines how trust is formed in robo-advisory services through a two-study mixed-methods design. Study 1 uses PLS-SEM with cIPMA to analyse the effects and optimisation priorities of trust antecedents, while Study 2 employs semi-structured interviews to deepen and validate the findings. Results show that autonomy and intelligence enhance algorithm interpretability, interactivity, and structural assurance, whereas anthropomorphism has no significant effect. Autonomy is a necessary condition for effective uncertainty reduction, and both interactivity and structural assurance are necessary for perceptions of competence and warmth. Algorithm interpretability functions as a prerequisite to these perceptions. Both warmth and competence increase trust, but only competence is a necessary prerequisite. The qualitative insights provide contextual depth, revealing mechanisms and boundary conditions often missed in quantitative work. By integrating human-like characteristics and uncertainty-reduction strategies into a unified framework, this study advances understanding of trust formation in emerging financial services and offers insights for strengthening digital financial inclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Yingting & Aw, Eugene Cheng-Xi & Tan, Garry Wei-Han & Ki, Chung-Wha (Chloe), 2026. "Trust in robo-advisory services: A mixed-methods study," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:beexfi:v:50:y:2026:i:c:s2214635026000559
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbef.2026.101193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214635026000559
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbef.2026.101193?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:beexfi:v:50:y:2026:i:c:s2214635026000559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-behavioral-and-experimental-finance .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.