IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v4y1978i1p39-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative energies of alternative fuels

Author

Listed:
  • Goodger, E.M.

Abstract

In order to provide additional design data on candidate alternative fuels, a broad comparison is made of the net calorific values of a wide variety of gaseous, liquid and solid fuels, including a number of alternatives of current interest, against a background of conventional fuels, some of which may have alternative applications. In general, higher gravimetric calorific values are shown by the lighter of the gaseous and liquid fuels and the heavier of the solid fuels. Volumetric calorific values rise with fuel density, with the exception of the fuel gases. Despite a wide overall range in calorific values, the gravimetric energy content of a stoichiometric fuel-air mixture is seen to be virtually independent of fuel type. In such applications as the spark-ignition piston engine and the rocket, additional combustion parameters arise which tend to overshadow calorific value and are therefore adopted for performance assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Goodger, E.M., 1978. "Comparative energies of alternative fuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 39-50, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:4:y:1978:i:1:p:39-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0306-2619(78)90018-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:4:y:1978:i:1:p:39-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.