IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v417y2026ics0306261926006677.html

Bayesian filtering techniques for state of charge and state of health estimation in lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles: Methods, challenges, and future directions

Author

Listed:
  • Kham, Sai Laung
  • Aunsri, Nattapol

Abstract

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) play a pivotal role in the advancement of electric vehicles (EVs) because they offer excellent energy capacity, longevity, and versatility across applications. Monitoring state of charge (SOC) and state of health (SOH) precisely is essential for battery safety and performance, but these states cannot be measured directly due to the nonlinear and interconnected behavior of the batteries. While the conventional model-based, data-driven, and hybrid approaches enhance SOC estimation, they frequently suffer from high computational demands, instability, and limited adaptability. To handle system noise, nonlinear dynamics, and uncertainty, Bayesian filtering methods—including Kalman filters (KFs) and particle filters (PFs)—have been shown to be both effective and efficient. This review provides a comprehensive and structured overview of Bayesian filtering techniques for SOC estimation and SOC–SOH estimation, encompassing both unified and multi-timescale estimation frameworks with offline-initialized and/or online-updated model parameters. This distinction reflects that inaccurate or time-varying parameters can introduce persistent SOC bias, while SOH degradation fundamentally alters battery dynamics during long-term operation. From a system-theoretic perspective, SOC, model parameters, and SOH evolve on distinct time scales—SOC varying rapidly, parameters drifting gradually, and SOH changing slowly due to cumulative aging—which motivates their separate and joint treatment within Bayesian filtering frameworks. Particular emphasis is placed on data usage characteristics, computational complexity, and engineering feasibility for practical battery management system implementation. Compared with existing surveys, this work introduces a unified classification framework that enables systematic comparison of traditional Bayesian filters, PFs employing KF-based proposal densities, machine learning (ML)-assisted Bayesian methods, and hybrid KF–PF approaches in terms of estimation accuracy, robustness, interpretability, and real-time applicability. Representative experimental results reported in the literature are consolidated to highlight the performance improvements of hybrid and ML-assisted Bayesian filtering methods under noise and aging effects, while explicitly revealing the associated computational and real-time implementation trade-offs. Overall, this review is distinguished by a unified organizational framework and an engineering-oriented perspective that directly relates estimation performance to computational complexity and real-time BMS constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Kham, Sai Laung & Aunsri, Nattapol, 2026. "Bayesian filtering techniques for state of charge and state of health estimation in lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles: Methods, challenges, and future directions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 417(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:417:y:2026:i:c:s0306261926006677
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.128015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261926006677
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.128015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:417:y:2026:i:c:s0306261926006677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.