IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v415y2026ics0306261926005350.html

Standardized framework for techno-economic assessment of heavy-duty vehicles: Insights from a state-of-the-art review

Author

Listed:
  • Costantino, Trentalessandro
  • Guichet, Xavier
  • Spessa, Ezio

Abstract

The growing demand for techno-economic evaluations in the heavy-duty vehicle (HDV) sector is reflected in the increasing number of recent publications. Driven by tightening global tailpipe emission targets, many studies focus on technologies that can achieve zero-tailpipe emissions, such as Battery Electric Vehicles, Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles, and Hydrogen Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles, often comparing them with conventional Diesel Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles. However, comparing results across studies remains challenging due to varying assumptions that can drastically alter outcomes. This underscores the need for a standardized methodology to ensure fair and consistent comparisons of these technologies, integrating both technological and economic factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Costantino, Trentalessandro & Guichet, Xavier & Spessa, Ezio, 2026. "Standardized framework for techno-economic assessment of heavy-duty vehicles: Insights from a state-of-the-art review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 415(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:415:y:2026:i:c:s0306261926005350
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261926005350
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127883?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:415:y:2026:i:c:s0306261926005350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.