Author
Listed:
- Sharifzadeh, Mahdi
- Shah, Nilay
Abstract
Decarbonizing hard-to-abate sectors in the UK will require scalable green hydrogen production derived from offshore wind energy, yet the optimal system configuration remains unclear due to fundamental trade-offs between economies of scale and transmission infrastructure costs. This study presents a superstructure optimisation framework for the integrated design and operation of multi-vector offshore wind energy hubs, providing a systematic comparison across twelve competing hydrogen and ammonia network configurations. Applied to the UK North Sea, the framework reveals that fixed-bottom offshore platform hubs with liquefied hydrogen delivered via seaborne vessels achieve the lowest cost at 0.0649 £/MJ (7.790 £/kg H₂), while turbine-integrated electrolysis with offshore Haber-Bosch synthesis achieves 0.0784 £/MJ (1.458 £/kg NH₃). Critically, turbine-integrated distributed electrolysis proves competitive at 0.0697 £/MJ (8.36 £/kg H₂), challenging conventional centralisation paradigms. Key findings demonstrate that liquefied hydrogen pathways consistently outperform compressed alternatives by 5.5–12% despite liquefaction penalties, floating platforms impose 33–35% cost premiums over fixed-bottom foundations, and onshore electrolysis with marine cable transmission incurs a 57% cost penalty relative to the optimal offshore configuration. The narrow performance range of 0.065–0.077 £/MJ across the six most economical hydrogen configurations confirms that multiple technology pathways can achieve commercial viability, emphasising site-specific optimisation over prescriptive technology mandates.
Suggested Citation
Sharifzadeh, Mahdi & Shah, Nilay, 2026.
"Integrated design and operation of offshore wind energy hubs: Multi-vector green hydrogen and ammonia networks,"
Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 415(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:appene:v:415:y:2026:i:c:s0306261926005349
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127882
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:415:y:2026:i:c:s0306261926005349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.