IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v413y2026ics0306261926004125.html

Industrial energy efficiency and decarbonisation via electrification and hydrogen

Author

Listed:
  • Bolson, Natanael
  • Watari, Takuma
  • Boocock, Richard
  • Cullen, Jonathan

Abstract

Decarbonising industrial energy systems requires a process-level understanding of where electrification and hydrogen can replace fossil fuels. However, national statistics typically report fuel use only at the sector level, which limits actionable planning. We develop a process-level energy allocation framework and apply it to the United Kingdom as a representative industrialised economy. Mapping energy use across devices, end uses, and passive systems shows that direct electrification reduces industrial energy demand by 24% and emissions by 39%. Hydrogen substitution delivers smaller energy savings of 7% and cuts emissions by 27%. A hybrid pathway that electrifies feasible processes and uses hydrogen where electrification is not possible matches the energy savings of electrification and achieves a 40% reduction in emissions. Prioritising electrification and reserving hydrogen for residual applications provides a robust and scalable route to industrial decarbonisation. The framework offers a transferable basis for aligning technology deployment with infrastructure and net-zero targets.

Suggested Citation

  • Bolson, Natanael & Watari, Takuma & Boocock, Richard & Cullen, Jonathan, 2026. "Industrial energy efficiency and decarbonisation via electrification and hydrogen," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 413(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:413:y:2026:i:c:s0306261926004125
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127760
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261926004125
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127760?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:413:y:2026:i:c:s0306261926004125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.