IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v413y2026ics0306261926004071.html

Collaborative inspection integrating both advanced LLM and traditional color difference quantification: A case study in infrared-based defect detection

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Zizhou
  • Huang, Yuchen
  • Bao, Yixing
  • Lyu, Junyu
  • Zhang, Haoran
  • Chu, Yinghao
  • Liu, Ke

Abstract

An average annual power loss of 18.9% caused by module faults underscores the need for defect detection, especially as global photovoltaic (PV) capacity surpasses the terawatt scale. Existing data-driven approaches face a persistent precision–recall trade-off: supervised models require extensive labeled data, unsupervised methods are often unstable in complex backgrounds, and multimodal large language models (LLMs) can suffer from domain mismatch and largely qualitative reasoning. Prompt engineering can mitigate domain gaps but cannot quantify visual features; thermal defects appear as pixel-level deviations that can be quantified via Euclidean-distance analysis. However, neither approach alone resolves the precision–recall trade-off, motivating an integrated collaborative mechanism. Therefore, we propose a prompt-driven Hybrid LLM-Integrated Detection Framework (HLIDF) consisting of three modules: (1) a Prompt Optimization Module to mitigate domain misalignment; (2) a Dual-LLMs Parallel Analysis Module that runs precision-focused and recall-focused LLMs in parallel with cross-verification; and (3) a Quantitative Color Difference Decision Module that resolves conflicts through pixel-wise Euclidean-distance analysis. On the PVF-10 dataset for binary fault detection, HLIDF achieves 95.67% accuracy with 96.04% precision, 97.76% recall, and a 96.89% F1-score without fine-tuning, reducing the recognition error rate by 53.09% relative to a supervised ViT baseline and by 50.46% relative to a naïve LLM baseline. As one of the first few studies applying multimodal LLMs to infrared-based PV defect detection, this work establishes a practical framework for industrial deployment under weak supervision. For a 10 MW PV system generating 13,000 MWh annually, under typical assumptions on detectable fault-induced losses and electricity value, HLIDF can preserve over 105,000 USD in annual energy value.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Zizhou & Huang, Yuchen & Bao, Yixing & Lyu, Junyu & Zhang, Haoran & Chu, Yinghao & Liu, Ke, 2026. "Collaborative inspection integrating both advanced LLM and traditional color difference quantification: A case study in infrared-based defect detection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 413(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:413:y:2026:i:c:s0306261926004071
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261926004071
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127755?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:413:y:2026:i:c:s0306261926004071. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.