Author
Listed:
- Huang, Yaowei
- Zhu, Rong
- Deng, Shuai
- Lin, Meng
Abstract
Electrochemical CO2 capture from air and oceanwater is promising, yet pathway choices are complicated by inconsistent assumptions and the lack of a unified link connecting cell physics to plant-level cost. As a result, it is still uncertain, under realistic constraints, how direct air capture (DAC), direct ocean capture (DOC), and desalination-integrated indirect ocean capture (IOC) compare in energy and cost. Here, we develop a unified framework, coupling carbonate chemistry, bipolar membrane electrodialysis (BPMED) stack losses, and vacuum stripping under common system boundaries, to quantify energy and levelized cost across DAC, DOC, and IOC. We show that vacuum stripping is essential for DOC and, in DAC, reduces the CO2-release onset charge by 88-fold, enabling efficient operation at low current densities. In DAC, vacuum stripping reduces electrochemical energy consumption by up to 88.0% and total system energy by up to 76.6%. Although DOC shows high energy costs for oceanwater intake and pre-treatment, IOC configurations that leverage existing desalination infrastructure offer significant reductions in system-level energy and cost. Our analysis identifies operating regimes where the marginal increase in electricity cost is offset by declining non-electricity costs, yielding distinct optima for each pathway. At industrial scale, the minimum levelized cost reaches $0.38/kg-CO2 for DAC with vacuum stripping and $0.55/kg-CO2 for IOC with vacuum stripping. This work establishes a comparative foundation for electrochemical CO2 capture from air and ocean, and provides quantitative guidance for pathway selection, device optimization, and site-specific deployment.
Suggested Citation
Huang, Yaowei & Zhu, Rong & Deng, Shuai & Lin, Meng, 2026.
"Toward scalable electrochemical CO2 capture from air and oceanwater: a unified techno-economic framework and design guidelines,"
Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 412(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:appene:v:412:y:2026:i:c:s0306261926003065
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127654
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:412:y:2026:i:c:s0306261926003065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.