Author
Listed:
- Uguz, Yasin Ferit
- Bilgili, Atakan
- Uzar, Melis
Abstract
Ensuring secure, affordable, and sustainable energy supply is a growing global challenge as rising demand and supply insecurity accelerate the transition to renewable energy. Hybrid wind–solar systems offer an effective solution by exploiting spatial and temporal resource complementarity, but their deployment critically depends on reliable site selection. Most multi-criteria decision analysis studies rely on a single weighting method, apply limited criteria evaluation, lack statistical validation, and rarely identify spatially coherent, investment-ready zones. This study addresses these gaps by proposing an integrated geographic decision-making framework for hybrid wind–solar siting that combines two expert-based weighting methods, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Best-Worst Method (BWM) with an objective, data-driven weighting method, CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) and machine learning–assisted criterion screening. The framework was applied to Izmir Province, Türkiye. Suitability maps generated under alternative weighting methods were compared using spatially adjusted statistical tests, clustered into contiguous high-suitability zones using hierarchical density-based spatial clustering (HDBSCAN), converted into candidate-site polygons, and prioritized using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and the Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC) method. The results revealed pronounced differences across weighting methods. Highly or very highly suitable areas accounted for 33.27% (AHP) and 27.75% (BWM) of candidate sites, compared with 58.39% under CRITIC. Validation using 703 existing solar photovoltaic and wind turbine installations showed agreement rates of 77.81%, 72.83%, and 83.65%, respectively. The resulting outputs provide actionable decision-support information for regional planning and the identification of investment-ready hybrid wind–solar zones.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:411:y:2026:i:c:s0306261926002618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.