Author
Listed:
- Qi, Meng
- Alirahmi, Seyed Mojtaba
- Cui, Chengtian
- Zhang, Zhiwei
- Zhang, Xiaodong
- Wang, Lina
- Chen, Ming
- Díaz-Sainz, Guillermo
- Yu, Haoshui
Abstract
Power-to-methanol offers a promising pathway for large-scale, long-term energy storage, yet hydrogen (H2)/syngas production remains the key techno-economic bottleneck. Solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs) can efficiently produce H2 and carbon monoxide, but with multiple options available (such as steam electrolysis, co-electrolysis, and CO2 electrolysis) and possible coupling with (reverse) water–gas shift reactions, it is still unclear which option and process pathway, whether alone or in hybrid, most effectively minimizes methanol production costs. This study addresses this gap with a two-stage framework that combines surrogate-based superstructure optimization with detailed process integration and assessment. The optimization reveals two cost-optimal, previously unexplored pathways featuring hybrid SOEC configurations: (i) production of CO-based feed gas using steam and CO2 electrolysis, and (ii) production of CO2-based feed gas with an additional water–gas shift step to generate additional H2 while producing CO2. Advanced process design is then conducted and shows that CO-based methanol synthesis outperforms the CO2-based route in terms of methanol yield and energy consumption. The combined steam and CO2 electrolysis configuration achieves the highest energy efficiency (74%), compared with co-electrolysis and steam electrolysis alone. The levelized cost of methanol is estimated at 1050–1155 USD/t, with the potential to decrease to bio- or fossil-methanol cost levels under projected reductions in electricity price and SOEC stack cost.
Suggested Citation
Qi, Meng & Alirahmi, Seyed Mojtaba & Cui, Chengtian & Zhang, Zhiwei & Zhang, Xiaodong & Wang, Lina & Chen, Ming & Díaz-Sainz, Guillermo & Yu, Haoshui, 2026.
"Superstructure optimization reveals novel cost-optimal power-to-methanol pathways using hybrid solid oxide electrolysis cells,"
Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 410(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:appene:v:410:y:2026:i:c:s030626192600231x
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127579
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:410:y:2026:i:c:s030626192600231x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.