Author
Listed:
- Centeno-Telleria, Manu
- Guanche, Raúl
- Penalba, Markel
Abstract
With only small-scale floating offshore wind (FOW) farms installed to date, and commercial-scale projects anticipated in the coming years, reconsidering conventional installation strategies is essential to understand the challenges associated with scaling up. To this end, this paper introduces a novel discrete-event simulation model, instaSIM®, which is validated against data corresponding to the Hywind Scotland farm, demonstrating discrepancies of less than five days between simulated and observed durations. Once validated, different scenarios for scaling up FOW installation are evaluated. Results indicate that farms comprising more than 10–15 turbines cannot be installed within a single year using the conventional installation strategy, with installation costs increasing significantly due to metocean-related delays. To address these limitations, three modular installation strategies are proposed and evaluated for a 40-turbine and 600-MW FOW farm: parallel, consecutive and hybrid. Compared to the conventional baseline of 1200 days and 225 M€, all three strategies reduce total installation costs by 54%. However, the total duration varies across strategies: the parallel approach requires 137 days (88% reduction), while the hybrid strategy requires 500 days (58% lower) and the consecutive configuration extends to 1232 days. In addition to cost savings, the modular strategies enable an earlier power generation and faster CAPEX recovery. By the time the conventional strategy completes installation and starts producing energy, the consecutive, hybrid and parallel approaches would have already produced 3.8 TWh, 6.4 TWh and 7.7 TWh of electricity, respectively, corresponding to revenues of 840 M€, 1370 M€ and 1650 M€, and CAPEX recoveries of 29%, 48% and 57%.
Suggested Citation
Centeno-Telleria, Manu & Guanche, Raúl & Penalba, Markel, 2026.
"Scaling up floating offshore wind farm installation: From conventional to modular strategies,"
Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 410(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:appene:v:410:y:2026:i:c:s0306261926002126
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127560
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:410:y:2026:i:c:s0306261926002126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.