IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v409y2026ics0306261926001716.html

Quantum-resistant homomorphic encryption for privacy-preserving demand flexibility and grid modernization: A systematized review

Author

Listed:
  • Mahuze, Richard A.
  • Amadeh, Ali
  • Gu, Jintao
  • Zhang, K. Max

Abstract

Demand flexibility programs could unlock 180 GW of building capacity in the United States by 2030, which is enough to avoid building nearly 200 large power plants. However, a fundamental conflict stalls this progress. Grid operators need granular consumer data to coordinate these resources, but privacy risks deter the participation required to unlock this capacity. Without privacy-preserving solutions, utilities must build expensive infrastructure instead of leveraging existing flexible loads. Homomorphic encryption (HE) offers a cryptographic solution by enabling computation directly on encrypted data, yet a comprehensive review evaluating whether quantum-secure HE schemes can meet the operational requirements of grid modernization and demand flexibility has been lacking. Quantum-resistant schemes, built on lattice-based cryptography resistant to attacks from both classical and quantum computers, are essential as adversaries can harvest encrypted data today and decrypt it once quantum computers mature. This is a critical concern given power infrastructure's multi-decade operational lifetime. This systematized review assesses 34 studies (with database searches through May 2025) against demand flexibility requirements, revealing critical gaps between current capabilities and deployment needs. We introduce a six-level taxonomy comprising Application Context, Operational Requirements, Threat & Security Model, HE Scheme, System Architecture, and Performance & Deployment to connect application needs with cryptographic design and deployment outcomes. Our analysis reveals that research is concentrated in distribution-level applications (79%), with energy theft monitoring/detection (29%) and smart meter data aggregation (26%) as the dominant workloads. However, the field's maturity is nascent, with 97% of studies remaining in proof-of-concept or lab prototype stages, and performance limitations create orders-of-magnitude gaps for real-time control. While the field has adopted advanced schemes like Cheon-Kim-Kim-Song (CKKS) (used in 53% of total studies), only 18% of applications target sub-minute operational timescales. We identify five critical research opportunities to bridge this theory-practice gap, including developing low-latency protocols and standardized benchmarks. Our findings provide a roadmap for future work, concluding that while quantum-resistant HE holds long-term promise, significant advances in algorithmic efficiency and hardware acceleration are required for widespread deployment in next-generation energy systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahuze, Richard A. & Amadeh, Ali & Gu, Jintao & Zhang, K. Max, 2026. "Quantum-resistant homomorphic encryption for privacy-preserving demand flexibility and grid modernization: A systematized review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 409(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:409:y:2026:i:c:s0306261926001716
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261926001716
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127519?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mahuze, Richard A. & Amadeh, Ali & Yuan, Bo & Zhang, K. Max, 2025. "Collaborative optimization framework for capacity planning of a prosumer-based peer-to-peer electricity trading community," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 384(C).
    2. Hui Zhu & Fen Liu & Rong Yan & Hui Li, 2015. "PAS: An Efficient Privacy-Preserving Multidimensional Aggregation Scheme for Smart Grid," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 11(10), pages 915795-9157, October.
    3. Maher Alaraj & Mohammed Radi & Elaf Alsisi & Munir Majdalawieh & Mohamed Darwish, 2025. "Machine Learning-Based Electric Vehicle Charging Demand Forecasting: A Systematized Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-92, September.
    4. van Stiphoudt, Christine & Potenciano Menci, Sergio & Kaymakci, Can & Wenninger, Simon & Bauer, Dennis & Duda, Sebastian & Fridgen, Gilbert & Sauer, Alexander, 2025. "The Energy Synchronization Platform concept in the model region Augsburg to enable and streamline automated industrial demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 388(C).
    5. Yamashita, Daniela Yassuda & Vechiu, Ionel & Gaubert, Jean-Paul, 2020. "A review of hierarchical control for building microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    6. Amadeh, Ali & Lee, Zachary E. & Zhang, K. Max, 2022. "Quantifying demand flexibility of building energy systems under uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    7. Anggraini, Dita & Amelin, Mikael & Söder, Lennart, 2025. "Business models for electric vehicle charging considering grid limitations: An extended review from the European electricity market perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 399(C).
    8. Nicolson, Moira L. & Fell, Michael J. & Huebner, Gesche M., 2018. "Consumer demand for time of use electricity tariffs: A systematized review of the empirical evidence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 276-289.
    9. Lee, Dasom & Hess, David J., 2021. "Data privacy and residential smart meters: Comparative analysis and harmonization potential," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    10. von Loessl, Victor, 2023. "Smart meter-related data privacy concerns and dynamic electricity tariffs: Evidence from a stated choice experiment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    11. Berthélemy, Michel & Escobar Rangel, Lina, 2015. "Nuclear reactors' construction costs: The role of lead-time, standardization and technological progress," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 118-130.
    12. Zhaosen Shi & Zeyu Yang & Alzubair Hassan & Fagen Li & Xuyang Ding, 2023. "A privacy preserving federated learning scheme using homomorphic encryption and secret sharing," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 82(3), pages 419-433, March.
    13. Ahmad, Jameel & Rizwan, Muhammad & Ali, Syed Farooq & Inayat, Usman & Abdul Muqeet, Hafiz & Imran, Muhammad & Awotwe, Tabbi, 2025. "Cybersecurity in smart microgrids using blockchain-federated learning and quantum-safe approaches: A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 393(C).
    14. Michel Berthélemy & Lina Escobar Rangel, 2015. "Nuclear reactors' construction costs: The role of lead-time, standardization and technological progress," Post-Print hal-01523016, HAL.
    15. Alessandro Liberati & Douglas G Altman & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Cynthia Mulrow & Peter C Gøtzsche & John P A Ioannidis & Mike Clarke & P J Devereaux & Jos Kleijnen & David Moher, 2009. "The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-28, July.
    16. Lee, Zachary E. & Zhang, K. Max, 2023. "Regulated peer-to-peer energy markets for harnessing decentralized demand flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gumber, Anurag & Zana, Riccardo & Steffen, Bjarne, 2024. "A global analysis of renewable energy project commissioning timelines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    2. Wyman-Pain, Heather & Bian, Yuankai & Thomas, Cain & Li, Furong, 2018. "The economics of different generation technologies for frequency response provision," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 554-563.
    3. Portugal-Pereira, J. & Ferreira, P. & Cunha, J. & Szklo, A. & Schaeffer, R. & Araújo, M., 2018. "Better late than never, but never late is better: Risk assessment of nuclear power construction projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 158-166.
    4. Perrier, Quentin, 2018. "The second French nuclear bet," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 858-877.
    5. Javier Parra-Domínguez & Esteban Sánchez & Ángel Ordóñez, 2023. "The Prosumer: A Systematic Review of the New Paradigm in Energy and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-44, July.
    6. Bo Nørregaard Jørgensen & Saraswathy Shamini Gunasekaran & Zheng Grace Ma, 2025. "Impact of EU Laws on AI Adoption in Smart Grids: A Review of Regulatory Barriers, Technological Challenges, and Stakeholder Benefits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-33, June.
    7. Sascha Samadi, 2016. "A Review of Factors Influencing the Cost Development of Electricity Generation Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-25, November.
    8. Elia, A. & Kamidelivand, M. & Rogan, F. & Ó Gallachóir, B., 2021. "Impacts of innovation on renewable energy technology cost reductions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    9. Xoubi, Ned, 2019. "Economic assessment of nuclear electricity from VVER-1000 reactor deployment in a developing country," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 14-22.
    10. Samadi, Sascha, 2018. "The experience curve theory and its application in the field of electricity generation technologies – A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2346-2364.
    11. Gangyang, Zheng & Xianke, Peng & Xiaozhen, Li & Yexi, Kang & Xiangeng, Zhao, 2021. "Research on the standardization strategy of China's nuclear industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    12. Levi, Peter G. & Pollitt, Michael G., 2015. "Cost trajectories of low carbon electricity generation technologies in the UK: A study of cost uncertainty," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 48-59.
    13. Batini, Nicoletta & Di Serio, Mario & Fragetta, Matteo & Melina, Giovanni & Waldron, Anthony, 2022. "Building back better: How big are green spending multipliers?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    14. Knapp, Vladimir & Pevec, Dubravko, 2018. "Promises and limitations of nuclear fission energy in combating climate change," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 94-99.
    15. Jeong, Minsoo & You, Jung S., 2022. "Estimating the economic costs of nuclear power plant outages in a regulated market using a latent factor model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    16. Zhou, Yuekuan, 2023. "Sustainable energy sharing districts with electrochemical battery degradation in design, planning, operation and multi-objective optimisation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 1324-1341.
    17. Casotti, André L.N. & Zio, Enrico, 2025. "Network analysis-enhanced project risk management for nuclear power plant construction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    18. Lovering, Jessica R. & Nordhaus, Ted & Yip, Arthur, 2017. "Apples and oranges: Comparing nuclear construction costs across nations, time periods, and technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 650-654.
    19. Milena Dalton & Benjamin Sanderson & Leanne J Robinson & Caroline S E Homer & William Pomat & Margie Danchin & Stefanie Vaccher, 2023. "Impact of COVID-19 on routine childhood immunisations in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(8), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Ludoviko Zirimenya & Fatima Mahmud-Ajeigbe & Ruth McQuillan & You Li, 2020. "A systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between urogenital schistosomiasis and HIV/AIDS infection," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:409:y:2026:i:c:s0306261926001716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.