IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v408y2026ics0306261925020756.html

Insight into safety and economic trade-offs for high-pressure PEMEC operation using Bayesian optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Dang, Jing
  • Qi, Meng
  • Na, Jonggeol
  • Deng, Zijian
  • Xu, Chi-Min
  • Feng, Wei
  • Liu, Yi

Abstract

As a pivotal technology for clean hydrogen production, proton exchange membrane electrolysis cells (PEMEC) have garnered widespread industrial adoption. The implementation of high-pressure operation in PEMEC systems enhances hydrogen output pressure, thereby reducing compression demands and associated costs in downstream transportation. However, this strategy potentially introduces critical safety challenges associated with gas crossover, particularly hydrogen-in‑oxygen (HTO) enrichment. To systematically address the inherent trade-offs between economic performance and safety risks, this study employs a novel proposed multi-objective optimization framework based on Bayesian optimization. Our methodology is designed to achieve explicit system-level objectives, maintaining the HTO concentration constraint below the safety threshold of 2%, while concurrently minimizing the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) and the inherent safety index (ISI). First, we established an integrated process model by combining first-principles unit models with process simulation to assess system performance and safety. Second, we implemented Bayesian optimization to navigate the multi-objective trade-offs. This method is well-suited for this problem due to its ability to efficiently handle high-dimensional, non-linear constrained optimization. Within this framework, the multi-objective optimization process simultaneously quantifies gas crossover dynamics for each set of evaluated parameters. The optimization results identify an optimal operational window, an operating pressure of 25–50 bar, a current density of 1.5–2.0 A/cm2, and a membrane thickness below 100 μm. This window provides a scientifically rigorous foundation for balancing economic and safety objectives in industrial-scale PEMEC applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Dang, Jing & Qi, Meng & Na, Jonggeol & Deng, Zijian & Xu, Chi-Min & Feng, Wei & Liu, Yi, 2026. "Insight into safety and economic trade-offs for high-pressure PEMEC operation using Bayesian optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 408(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:408:y:2026:i:c:s0306261925020756
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.127345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925020756
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.127345?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:408:y:2026:i:c:s0306261925020756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.