Author
Listed:
- Makasis, N.
- Kreitmair, M.J.
- Chen, K.
- Su, Z.
- Choudhary, R.
- Soga, K.
Abstract
Geothermal energy systems have the potential to significantly contribute towards the decarbonisation of heating and cooling. While robust methods exist for systems at local scale, assessing the geothermal potential at city scale remains prohibitively difficult. This constitutes a significant barrier to wider geothermal utilisation, as uncertainty can prevent investment. This paper introduces a methodology for city-scale geothermal potential quantification, building on previous work on quantifying the thermal state beneath cities. The methodology utilises statistical clustering to identify locations with similar thermal responses, producing ‘geothermal archetypes’, significantly reducing computational costs. Through the synergistic combination of numerical and analytical approaches, the potential for large-scale geothermal exploitation is quantified, considering downstream effects. This methodology is applied to two locations, Cambridge, UK, and Berkeley, USA, to perform a range of analyses, demonstrating its wide applicability. The importance of local demand is showcased, highlighting the inability of city centre areas to satisfy heating/cooling demand using solely geothermal energy. Notably, coordinated provision of heating and cooling, e.g., using networks, is shown to be a promising way to utilise geothermal energy holistically, increasing the proportion of the city-wide thermal demand that can be met from ∼45 % to ∼70 % for Cambridge and from ∼80 % to 100 % for Berkeley.
Suggested Citation
Makasis, N. & Kreitmair, M.J. & Chen, K. & Su, Z. & Choudhary, R. & Soga, K., 2026.
"Finding common ground: A comparative study of city-scale shallow geothermal potential for Cambridge, UK, and Berkeley, USA,"
Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 403(PB).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:appene:v:403:y:2026:i:pb:s0306261925017921
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.127062
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:403:y:2026:i:pb:s0306261925017921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.