Author
Listed:
- Xia, Xin
- Luo, Yong
- Li, Peidu
- Chang, Rui
- Liao, Zhouyi
- Huang, Lei
Abstract
Accurate short-term (0–72 h) forecasting of wind speed and power is essential for wind energy integration, yet remains hindered by persistent biases in Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models. This study presents the first systematic evaluation of Transformer-based time series forecasting (TSF) models for post-processing Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) simulations. Using three years (2020−2022) of data from four operational wind farms in northwestern China, we assessed Pyraformer, Autoformer, Reformer, and other TSF variants. Multi-resolution architectures, particularly Pyraformer, demonstrate clear superiority. Compared to raw WRF hub-height wind speeds, Pyraformer reduces root mean squared error (RMSE) by up to 27 %, and relative to other Transformers, improves power forecasting accuracy by 3–6 % and qualification rate by 3–9 %. Mechanistic analysis reveals that decomposition-based Transformers fail by spuriously fitting temporal trends in stationary WRF biases, while multi-resolution architectures effectively correct these regime-dependent errors through scale-aware attention. A unified evaluation framework shows that nonlinear wind-to-power conversion amplifies meteorological uncertainties, resulting in consistently higher normalized errors in power forecasts than in wind speed forecasts across lead times and wind regimes. All methods are implemented within an integrated Global Forecast System (GFS)-WRF-AI pipeline. These findings offer mechanistic insights for next-generation hybrid forecasting model development and demonstrate the potential of advanced TSF architectures for operational wind power forecasting.
Suggested Citation
Xia, Xin & Luo, Yong & Li, Peidu & Chang, Rui & Liao, Zhouyi & Huang, Lei, 2026.
"Systematic evaluation of transformer-based time series forecasting models for post-processing WRF-simulated wind speed and predicting short-term power output,"
Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 403(PA).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:appene:v:403:y:2026:i:pa:s0306261925018008
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.127070
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:403:y:2026:i:pa:s0306261925018008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.