Author
Abstract
In electricity markets, dispatch instructions and price signals are typically derived from the primal and dual solutions of the market clearing models. The prevailing market clearing methods can be summarized as: determining dispatch instructions to maximize social welfare, and subsequently calculating prices to support a competitive equilibrium. However, this sequential approach may violate critical market operation requirements, such as consumer payment reduction and price caps. Inherent conflicts often exist between these economic properties and market operation requirements. Since some of these properties are jointly determined by dispatch and pricing decisions, the sequential optimization approach inherently limits the ability to realize the full coordination benefits. To address this gap, this paper proposes a novel market clearing method that co-optimizes dispatch instructions and price signals to balance conflicting market objectives. Firstly, this paper analyzes the conflict mechanism between the aforementioned properties and requirements under the prevailing market clearing paradigms. Secondly, a co-optimization market clearing method to trade off conflicting properties and requirements is proposed. The basic idea and general mathematical formulation of the proposed method are introduced. The distinctions and connections between the proposed method and existing methods are clarified. Thirdly, the application of the proposed method is explored in typical scenarios involving consumer payment reduction and price caps. Finally, numerical analysis demonstrates that the proposed method achieves a flexible balance between conflicting properties and requirements. For instance, it can significantly reduce consumer payments by 80.33 % while limiting increases in system operation costs to within 1.98 %; alternatively, it can reduce lost opportunity costs to zero under price caps at the expense of a 0.52 % increase in system operation costs.
Suggested Citation
Wang, Yi & Yang, Zhifang, 2026.
"Co-optimize dispatch and pricing in market clearing problem to balance conflicting market objectives,"
Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 403(PA).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:appene:v:403:y:2026:i:pa:s0306261925017957
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.127065
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:403:y:2026:i:pa:s0306261925017957. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.