IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v402y2026ipbs030626192501788x.html

Synergy mapping-informed learning rate estimation for bipolar membrane electrodialysis in carbon dioxide removal

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Ruoqing
  • He, Wei

Abstract

Delivering cost-effective carbon dioxide removal (CDR) will require rapid cost declines in emerging options that still face large technical and market uncertainty. We develop a synergy mapping framework that turns this uncertainty into a set of managed risks by making explicit where bipolar membrane electrodialysis (BMED) for CO2 removal can co-learn and co-scale with more mature electrochemical systems, notably electrodialysis and electrolyzers, and where BMED needs bespoke innovation. We use two complementary estimates to manage uncertainty: a top-down inversion sets LR targets consistent with a 100 $/tCO₂ levelized cost under established net-zero scenarios, while a bottom-up aggregation, informed by synergy mapping, estimates the achievable LR from transferable components. Top-down yields a goal LR band of 10.74–21.84 % across 2030 and 2050 at 5–100 % shares; bottom-up gives an achievable 12.3 % (with a 95 % confidence interval of 12.24 % - 12.29 %). Overlaying them shows feasibility by 2050 at 25–100 % share, and shortfalls at 5 % in 2050 and all 2030 scenarios, driven by limited early cumulative capacity and BPM bottlenecks. To close gaps, leveraging shared manufacturing expertise from ED and electrolyzers and roll-to-roll membrane scale-up, such as BMED-specific gaps (water-splitting catalyst innovation and BPM production capacity), remain critical. By making explicit where knowledge transfer is feasible and where novel research is still needed, this framework provides practical guidance for stakeholders aiming to bring BMED-CDR to commercial readiness while advancing the technical maturity.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Ruoqing & He, Wei, 2026. "Synergy mapping-informed learning rate estimation for bipolar membrane electrodialysis in carbon dioxide removal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 402(PB).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:402:y:2026:i:pb:s030626192501788x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.127058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626192501788X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.127058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grafström, Jonas & Lindman, Åsa, 2017. "Invention, innovation and diffusion in the European wind power sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 179-191.
    2. Ibadillah A. Digdaya & Ian Sullivan & Meng Lin & Lihao Han & Wen-Hui Cheng & Harry A. Atwater & Chengxiang Xiang, 2020. "A direct coupled electrochemical system for capture and conversion of CO2 from oceanwater," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Xaviery N. Penisa & Michael T. Castro & Jethro Daniel A. Pascasio & Eugene A. Esparcia & Oliver Schmidt & Joey D. Ocon, 2020. "Projecting the Price of Lithium-Ion NMC Battery Packs Using a Multifactor Learning Curve Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Wei, Max & Smith, Sarah J. & Sohn, Michael D., 2017. "Experience curve development and cost reduction disaggregation for fuel cell markets in Japan and the US," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 346-357.
    5. Noah Kittner & Felix Lill & Daniel M. Kammen, 2017. "Energy storage deployment and innovation for the clean energy transition," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 2(9), pages 1-6, September.
    6. Zvi Griliches, 1998. "Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey," NBER Chapters, in: R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, pages 287-343, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Wei, Yi-Ming & Peng, Song & Kang, Jia-Ning & Liu, Lan-Cui & Zhang, Yunlong & Yang, Bo & Yu, Bi-Ying & Liao, Hua, 2025. "Unlocking the economic potential of Direct Air Capture technology: Insights from a component-based learning curve," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    8. Kobos, Peter H. & Erickson, Jon D. & Drennen, Thomas E., 2006. "Technological learning and renewable energy costs: implications for US renewable energy policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(13), pages 1645-1658, September.
    9. Rubin, Edward S. & Azevedo, Inês M.L. & Jaramillo, Paulina & Yeh, Sonia, 2015. "A review of learning rates for electricity supply technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 198-218.
    10. Fernandez-Gonzalez, C. & Dominguez-Ramos, A. & Ibañez, R. & Irabien, A., 2015. "Sustainability assessment of electrodialysis powered by photovoltaic solar energy for freshwater production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 604-615.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samadi, Sascha, 2018. "The experience curve theory and its application in the field of electricity generation technologies – A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2346-2364.
    2. Yang, Chen & Liu, Ding-Fei & Liu, Si-Meng, 2025. "Energy and cost analysis of automotive batteries based on learning curve and configuration design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    3. Reinhard Haas & Marlene Sayer & Amela Ajanovic & Hans Auer, 2023. "Technological learning: Lessons learned on energy technologies," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), March.
    4. Elia, A. & Kamidelivand, M. & Rogan, F. & Ó Gallachóir, B., 2021. "Impacts of innovation on renewable energy technology cost reductions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    5. Grafström, Jonas & Poudineh, Rahmat, 2023. "No evidence of counteracting policy effects on European solar power invention and diffusion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    6. Maharjan, Prapti & Hauck, Mara & Kirkels, Arjan & Buettner, Benjamin & de Coninck, Heleen, 2024. "Deriving experience curves: A structured and critical approach applied to PV sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    7. Bello, S. & Reiner, 2024. "Experience Curves for Electrolysis Technologies," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2476, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    8. He, Zhengxia & Cao, Changshuai & Kuai, Leyi & Zhou, Yanqing & Wang, Jianming, 2022. "Impact of policies on wind power innovation at different income levels: Regional differences in China based on dynamic panel estimation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Esmaeil Ahmadi & Benjamin McLellan & Seiichi Ogata & Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo & Tetsuo Tezuka, 2020. "An Integrated Planning Framework for Sustainable Water and Energy Supply," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-37, May.
    10. Saheed Bello & David M Reiner, 2024. "Experience curves for electrolysis technologies," Working Papers EPRG2420, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    11. Thomassen, Gwenny & Van Passel, Steven & Dewulf, Jo, 2020. "A review on learning effects in prospective technology assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    12. Odam, Neil & de Vries, Frans P., 2020. "Innovation modelling and multi-factor learning in wind energy technology," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    13. Wiser, Ryan & Millstein, Dev, 2020. "Evaluating the economic return to public wind energy research and development in the United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    14. Toribio-Ramirez, D.A. & van der Zwaan, B.C.C. & Detz, R.J. & Faaij, A., 2025. "A review of methods to analyze technological change in industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    15. Choi, Donghyun & Kim, Yeong Jae, 2023. "Local and global experience curves for lumpy and granular energy technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    16. Castrejon-Campos, Omar & Aye, Lu & Hui, Felix Kin Peng, 2022. "Effects of learning curve models on onshore wind and solar PV cost developments in the USA," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    17. Bello, Saheed & Reiner, David, 2025. "Experience curve analyses for green hydrogen technology development," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    18. Juárez-Luna, David & Mosiño, Alejandro, 2024. "Electricity generation portfolios in Mexico: Environmental, economic, and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    19. Nuñez-Jimenez, Alejandro & Knoeri, Christof & Hoppmann, Joern & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2022. "Beyond innovation and deployment: Modeling the impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies in Germany's solar policy mix," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    20. Lin, Boqiang & Chen, Yufang, 2019. "Does electricity price matter for innovation in renewable energy technologies in China?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 259-266.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:402:y:2026:i:pb:s030626192501788x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.