IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v401y2025ipas0306261925014199.html

Identification of key control variables for a methanation unit through system analysis using experimental results

Author

Listed:
  • Aubin, Philippe
  • Yu, Hangyu
  • Wang, Ligang
  • Van herle, Jan

Abstract

The operation of methanation units, whether standalone or integrated with low or high temperature electrolysis, relies on the objective function to be maximized. In the cases of standalone operation or low temperature water electrolysis integration, the objective function is typically the higher heating value (HHV) based efficiency. The co-generation efficiency which includes the steam produced from the reaction’s heat should be optimized for applications such as the coupling with steam electrolysis: solid-oxide electrolyser (SOE). This last case, assuming a methanation unit with heat recovery and direct steam production by the cooling system, was simulated while assuming both an equilibrium reactor, and a reactor with direct, previously published, measurements of conversion and heat loss. The simulations aimed to (1) identify the effect of the connectivity in the heat recovery system, and (2) diagnose the trade-offs between the HHV efficiency and co-generation efficiency as the control parameters are modified. Dividing the product gases to pre-heat both the reactant and cooling water provided the highest efficiencies. Assuming this configuration along with the direct conversion and heat loss measurements, an optimal water pressure of 20.73 bar A was identified to maximize the HHV efficiency (72.37 %, up from 71.91 % at 12 bar A). Yet, the co-generation improved by 2.09 % from 12 to 23 bar A. However, the trend suggests possible optimal water pressures for the co-generation efficiency at higher pressures than the upper bound of the simulation. Similarly, the reaction pressure would need to be increased beyond the simulated range to reach the possible optimal pressures. Conversely, between the minimum and maximum reactant flow rates, the HHV efficiency decreases by 0.6 % due to the drop in conversion while the co-generation improves by 1.75 % because the reduction in the specific heat loss surpasses the decrease in conversion.

Suggested Citation

  • Aubin, Philippe & Yu, Hangyu & Wang, Ligang & Van herle, Jan, 2025. "Identification of key control variables for a methanation unit through system analysis using experimental results," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 401(PA).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:401:y:2025:i:pa:s0306261925014199
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126689
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925014199
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126689?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Ligang & Rao, Megha & Diethelm, Stefan & Lin, Tzu-En & Zhang, Hanfei & Hagen, Anke & Maréchal, François & Van herle, Jan, 2019. "Power-to-methane via co-electrolysis of H2O and CO2: The effects of pressurized operation and internal methanation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1432-1445.
    2. de Avila Ferreira, Tafarel & Wuillemin, Zacharie & Faulwasser, Timm & Salzmann, Christophe & Van herle, Jan & Bonvin, Dominique, 2019. "Enforcing optimal operation in solid-oxide fuel-cell systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 281-293.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Ligang & Zhang, Yumeng & Pérez-Fortes, Mar & Aubin, Philippe & Lin, Tzu-En & Yang, Yongping & Maréchal, François & Van herle, Jan, 2020. "Reversible solid-oxide cell stack based power-to-x-to-power systems: Comparison of thermodynamic performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    2. Geng, Wangning & Yuan, Jiming & Zhang, Lige & Hong, Chunfeng & Qian, Xinyao & Yao, Huichao & Du, Xian-Long & Li, Tao & Wang, Xiulin & Wang, Jian-Qiang & Xiao, Guoping, 2025. "Modeling and optimization of a novel power-to-methanol system based on SOEC CO2/H2O co-electrolysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 395(C).
    3. Zhong, Like & Yao, Erren & Zou, Hansen & Xi, Guang, 2022. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis of a directly solar-driven power-to-methane system by detailed distributed parameter method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    4. Chauvy, Remi & Dubois, Lionel & Lybaert, Paul & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2020. "Production of synthetic natural gas from industrial carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    5. Li, Zheng & Zhang, Hao & Xu, Haoran & Xuan, Jin, 2021. "Advancing the multiscale understanding on solid oxide electrolysis cells via modelling approaches: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    6. Choe, Changgwon & Cheon, Seunghyun & Gu, Jiwon & Lim, Hankwon, 2022. "Critical aspect of renewable syngas production for power-to-fuel via solid oxide electrolysis: Integrative assessment for potential renewable energy source," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. Qi, Meng & Park, Jinwoo & Landon, Robert Stephen & Kim, Jeongdong & Liu, Yi & Moon, Il, 2022. "Continuous and flexible Renewable-Power-to-Methane via liquid CO2 energy storage: Revisiting the techno-economic potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    8. Pérez-Trujillo, Juan Pedro & Elizalde-Blancas, Francisco & McPhail, Stephen J. & Della Pietra, Massimiliano & Bosio, Barbara, 2020. "Preliminary theoretical and experimental analysis of a Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell operating in reversible mode," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    9. Nogueira Nakashima, Rafael & Nami, Hossein & Nemati, Arash & Butera, Giacomo & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio & Vang Hendriksen, Peter & Frandsen, Henrik Lund, 2025. "Techno-economic evaluation of pyrolysis and electrolysis integration for methanol and char production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    10. Hanfei Zhang & Ligang Wang & Jan Van herle & François Maréchal & Umberto Desideri, 2019. "Techno-Economic Optimization of CO 2 -to-Methanol with Solid-Oxide Electrolyzer," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Promsen, Mungmuang & Komatsu, Yosuke & Sciazko, Anna & Kaneko, Shozo & Shikazono, Naoki, 2023. "Power maximization and load range extension of solid oxide fuel cell operation by water cooling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    12. Wehrle, Lukas & Schmider, Daniel & Dailly, Julian & Banerjee, Aayan & Deutschmann, Olaf, 2022. "Benchmarking solid oxide electrolysis cell-stacks for industrial Power-to-Methane systems via hierarchical multi-scale modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    13. Wang, Ligang & Chen, Ming & Küngas, Rainer & Lin, Tzu-En & Diethelm, Stefan & Maréchal, François & Van herle, Jan, 2019. "Power-to-fuels via solid-oxide electrolyzer: Operating window and techno-economics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 174-187.
    14. Zhang, Hanfei & Desideri, Umberto, 2020. "Techno-economic optimization of power-to-methanol with co-electrolysis of CO2 and H2O in solid-oxide electrolyzers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    15. Wang, Ligang & Zhang, Yumeng & Li, Chengzhou & Pérez-Fortes, Mar & Lin, Tzu-En & Maréchal, François & Van herle, Jan & Yang, Yongping, 2020. "Triple-mode grid-balancing plants via biomass gasification and reversible solid-oxide cell stack: Concept and thermodynamic performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    16. Fózer, Dániel & Volanti, Mirco & Passarini, Fabrizio & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Mizsey, Péter, 2020. "Bioenergy with carbon emissions capture and utilisation towards GHG neutrality: Power-to-Gas storage via hydrothermal gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    17. Jalili, Mohammad & Ghazanfari Holagh, Shahriyar & Chitsaz, Ata & Song, Jian & Markides, Christos N., 2023. "Electrolyzer cell-methanation/Sabatier reactors integration for power-to-gas energy storage: Thermo-economic analysis and multi-objective optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    18. Sonia Dell’Aversano & Carlo Villante & Katia Gallucci & Giuseppina Vanga & Andrea Di Giuliano, 2024. "E-Fuels: A Comprehensive Review of the Most Promising Technological Alternatives towards an Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-43, August.
    19. Furst, Oscar & Wehrle, Lukas & Schmider, Daniel & Dailly, Julian & Deutschmann, Olaf, 2024. "Modeling, optimization and comparative assessment of power-to-methane and carbon capture technologies for renewable fuel production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 375(C).
    20. Zhong, Like & Xu, Shanshan & Yang, Qianpeng & Yao, Erren & Xi, Guang & Cui, Xiaoti & Højgaard Jensen, Søren, 2025. "Thermal management of solid oxide electrolysis cell under dynamic electrothermal self-balancing strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:401:y:2025:i:pa:s0306261925014199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.